rdeets

joined 11 months ago
5
submitted 11 months ago by rdeets to c/ukraine
[–] rdeets 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Original article from CNBC:

These are America’s 10 worst states to live and work in for 2023, and there’s a big surprise at the very bottom - CNBC July 14, 2023

MEDIA BIAS FACT CHECK rates CNBC as:

Overall, we rate CNBC Left-Center Biased based on story selection that leans left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to two failed fact checks.

Further, U.S. News & World Report has multiple Missouri state rankings, with the majority holding rankings between # 30/50 and # 39/50, with an overall ranking of # 30/50.

Missouri | #30 in Overall Ranking - U.S. News & World Report

MEDIA BIAS FACT CHECK rates U.S. News & World Report as:

Overall, we rate U.S. News & World Report Left-Center biased based on story selection that slightly favors the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record.

However, if learning about people "jerking themselves off whenever some shitstick propaganda outlet runs an opinion piece that they agree with" is of interested to you, you may be interested in this article:

GOP's crumbling case against Biden on crime, immigration and inflation - AXIOS July 22, 2023

Words that have proven wise to live by:

"Every Republican accusation is a confession."

[–] rdeets 5 points 11 months ago

I can relate.

A number of issues, not the least of which was my birther believing unironically that Obama was the Antichrist, led me to go no contact with my family for what will be an entire decade come this December.

[–] rdeets 17 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Is that half of the point of a social link aggregation and discussion platform?

[–] rdeets 39 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is that half of the point of a social link aggregation and discussion platform?

[–] rdeets 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is that half of the point of a social link aggregation and discussion platform?

[–] rdeets 11 points 11 months ago

For the "ThErE aRe WaYs To DiScHaRgE sTuDeNt DeBt!1!1!!" crowd:

I've been trying to get approved for SSDI since November 2020. I'm 36 and have an MBA with ~$156,000 in student loan debt.

I'm Autistic with PTSD, C-PTSD, Chronic Suicidal Ideation, Chronic Insomnia, Agoraphobia, Treatment-Resistant Depression, Multiple Anxiety Disorders, IBS-C, IBS-D, Fibromaylygia, Recurrent SIBO, potentially Sjögren's Syndrome (I had a saliva gland lip biopsy yesterday), Hypoglycemia, GERD, Anal Fissures, and the diagnoses keep growing.

I haven't been able to work since December 2019.

I received my FIFTH denial from SSA in late May (I took the first claim to the Appeals Council and started my second claim in October 2022 after the Appeals Council upheld the ALJ Denial). I'm currently trying to find a lawyer (again).

Granted, the above is anecdotal, but I have seen anecdotes like mine all over social media and IRL, especially with the pandemic and Long-COVID.

These "targeted student loan forgiveness options" are virtually impossible to receive, and you pretty much have to "spend" the equivalent of the student loan amount between lost wages and lawyer fees actually to have a chance to be eligible for them.

Student loan forgiveness needs to happen. It needs to be comprehensive and wide-ranging. It's not only the humane thing to do, it's the best chance of stabilizing our economy long-term (followed by climate change mediation and reversal).

[–] rdeets 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
  1. I'm just getting started, but I'll become more active as I get used to Lemmy's interface.

  2. I'm passionate about politics. I'm Autistic and you could say that politics is my special interest.

  3. Well, we know what not to do after years of watching the abuse by the mods of r/politics. It should be open, simple, and reputable. Ban disinformation and hate speech, filter out tabloid sources, and focus on driving healthy conversations within the community.

  4. It depends on your definition of "political views". Disinformation, hate speech, and anti-science propaganda that leads to people getting killed has no place in a civil community.

[–] rdeets 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's over the summaries of the books.

This is from The Verge's article:

In the OpenAI suit, the trio offers exhibits showing that when prompted, ChatGPT will summarize their books, infringing on their copyrights. Silverman’s Bedwetter is the first book shown being summarized by ChatGPT in the exhibits, while Golden’s book Ararat is also used as an example, as is Kadrey’s book Sandman Slim. The claim says the chatbot never bothered to “reproduce any of the copyright management information Plaintiffs included with their published works.”

If The Verge is correct and the lawsuit is over summaries, I don't see how the lawsuit would have any legal standing. But, then again, this SCOTUS hasn't really concerned itself with the legal standing requirement in lawsuits, so the lawsuit could hold but for the wrong reasons.

Under a sane legal system, the plaintiffs could only hope to get the summaries properly cited. But, we aren't exactly under a sane legal system.

[–] rdeets 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I think a more appropriate comparison would be CliffNotes.

If they’re suing over summaries of their books and win, then the entire concept of the Cliff Notes company would be thrown into copyright liability, no?

AI does need to be regulated, but it needs to be regulated with common sense and forward-thinking. This lawsuit is not that.

view more: ‹ prev next ›