pycorax

Depends, I played Yakuza 8 with no issues ok launch and the newer stuff like the Ally haven't had a significant jump in performance.

Seems like an unpopular opinion but I actually like the Far Cry formula. It's the same gameplay loop with different maps and weapons and that's all I really ask for because I know what I'm getting is something that I know I enjoyed and will enjoy. I don't play Far Cry to experience some innovative gameplay, there's other games I look to for that.

I already wasn't a fan of the changes to Far Cry 6 and these changes don't seem like a Far Cry game anymore so I'm a bit disappointed if these are true.

Man I haven't watched the final episode yet but almost all the episodes leading up to it left me in shambles. Can't wait to get my heart torn up later.

Some communities just don't really have an equivalent elsewhere but I'm purely only lurking now. Don't comment anymore, use a modded third party client on mobile and ublock origin on desktop.

What's wrong with the name? XR is a term hats been used for years.

It's really helpful as someone trying to learn a language since I can just use it to select words I don't know and immediately translate them or look them up in a dictionary.

3. An M Pro esque chip was also in the plans, but seemingly canceled? Or way behind AMD, at least. And OEMs have repeatedly rejected their GPU heavy designs like Broadwell eDRAM and the AMD collab chip, as they're kinda idiots and Intel is at their mercy. And the laptop chips they are selling now are basically their best shot at an "M" chip and arguably one of their most decent products.

Wasn't Lunar Lake supposed to be this?

Bokura. This is a bit hard though since the Steam store page kind of spoils it but just get it and think of it as a cool short co-op puzzle platformer.

For what it's worth, this seems more like a lower profile title which seems to be more well liked. Stuff like Immortals and the new Prince of Persia game were apparently pretty good I heard?

Both RISC and CISC decode into micro-ops regardless. Read the article, it goes into detail, the diagrams make it pretty clear if you don't want to read the whole article. Modern processors have no notable differences between RISC or CISC designs anymore in the way you described. The only thing RISC and CISC differs in is essentially just the interface that assemblers assemble code into. Which is different across ISAs anyways.

That's not true at all. It's a common misconception but there's nothing stopping x86 from also targeting a power efficient design. It's all about architecture and not the instruction set. There just hasn't been an incentive for Intel and AMD to focus their architectures on power efficiency since they make much more money in the server space. Lunar Lake is Intel's first real attempt at it.

The Z1 Extreme has already shown very comparable and sometimes better performance and power efficiency as the M2 chips and the Lunar Lake chips trade blows with the X Elite not just in performance but also power draw.

If you wanna know more, this goes very in depth on what the differences are: https://chipsandcheese.com/p/why-x86-doesnt-need-to-die

With Lunar Lake proving that x86 can contend with ARM if it wants to, I'm not sure why anyone would consider these laptops which perform about the same but with compatibility issues.