Looking outside the ST universe, I'd say the perfect "breather" episode for a series would be Doctor Who (2005) S03E10 - Blink. 3 minutes of recording from the primary talent, and the entire rest of the episode is done by extras and every moment of it is engaging and extremely well done.
pleasejustdie
I'm guessing someone failed to include a font pack for icons with the release, so what we're seeing is the unicode gibberish that would be styled and replaced with icons from the font pack if it existed, but since it doesn't its getting rendered with a default font instead. It could also be something else entirely, but that's my initial assumption.
I won both the daily and the weekly challenge today, I think I'm getting the handle of this variant better.
Daily 919
Daily Quordle 919
7️⃣4️⃣
6️⃣5️⃣
m-w.com/games/quordle/
⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜🟨🟨🟨
⬜🟩⬜🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜🟩
🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨⬜⬜🟩⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬜⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜🟨🟩🟨🟨
⬜🟨⬜🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟨
⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
Weekly Challenge
Weekly Quordle Challenge 58
8️⃣4️⃣
9️⃣5️⃣
m-w.com/games/quordle/
⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟩⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟨🟨🟨🟨⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨
⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟨⬜🟨 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
A Mary Sue can still fail, they just usually succeed. The biggest issues with a Mary Sue aren't their success, its the believability of their success. Is it reasonable for this person to be so skilled. If they have PHD level knowledge in 15 different fields, that's a bit much. But they may have PHD level knowledge in 1 or 2 fields, and they may be able to get through like that without coming off as a Mary Sue, look at The Martian by Andy Weir (or the movie with Matt Damon) The premise of sending people with 2 PHDs in complementary fields to reduce the number of people needing to be sent makes logical sense, so him being an expert, and also being the right kind of expert, to survive makes sense. And the fact he isn't an expert in everything else helped drive the narrative and provided the direction and the plot in a reasonable and believable way.
I think that's what is important, not making your character flawless, or even introducing some flaws to a flawless character, because that still ends up coming off weird, but instead start with a flawed character and then remove flaws until you have just enough to make everything the character needs to survive believable. Another view of this, Die Hard, John McClaine wasn't the typical Mary Sue, he wasn't perfect and the audience feels like he's constantly in danger and just a mixture of skill and luck gets him through it. A flawed character is more impactful to the reader. I am a flawed person, I relate better to flawed people.
As an Arizonan, if Mark Kelley goes, I'll be sad to see him go, but I think he's a great guy and would do amazing in the position. So we'd either gain a great VP, or I'll keep a great Senator, so I'm OK either way. But from a political standpoint, Mark Kelly, being a white male, an astronaut, etc brings a bit of the familiar to the ticket for people who may be undecided but lean right. And coming from a swing state, it could cement the undecided votes to swing in her favor and could influence other swing states as well. And the same might be said about any of the picks, but the one I'm most familiar with is the one from my own state, and I think he'd do a pretty damn good job and he'd do that job with integrity.
I went to request my primary ballot, as an independent I get to chose which primary I want to participate in, and when I went to request it I found out I had been removed from the registered voter list and removed from the mail in voter list, so I had to re-register, which I was able to do online. But I had no warning I had been removed from the lists, if I hadn't been actively looking into it, I would have missed the primary and who knows if I would have noticed before the general election... Been voting for years (both in person, and the last few years by mail), had the same address for over a decade now, and someone decided to just silently remove me from the system. So I'd definitely recommend people make sure they didn't have their voter registrations mysteriously vanish from the system too.
She doesn't want to lose the nutjob vote, she just doesn't want to let the nutjobs run the whole asylum.
at which point 3 people's views were ignored which is why they dissented to the majority opinion. Joe Biden in 2020 had 51.5% of the vote, under your same logic 155 million people as a group decided to elect Joe Biden. Which, while technically true, you're pushing semantics at that point that minimizes the differences in views and opinions.
They have a high mortality rate pre-hatch as well in the wild. A parent accidentally stepping on an egg is very very common and the larger the clutch the more common it happens.
Because harassing the Jurors won't change the outcome of the case since the Jurors have already done everything they are going to do, so harassing them can no longer harm the case, which is probably his primary concern. He obviously would prefer that Trump not attack them, but he's giving Trump rope and a warning, so we'll see if Trump ignores the rope, or if he can't help himself but to open his mouth and stick his head in it.
nowhere near VA, I'm in AZ, no experience with it there.
Event Horizon