i am unable to understand how that works; please help.
if these are indeed references to assertions made in their paper, how can they be irrelevant?
i am unable to understand how that works; please help.
if these are indeed references to assertions made in their paper, how can they be irrelevant?
oh no, linekar is leaving motd? first wrighty, now him?
i don't think shearer and micah can pull it off themselves going forward. they're both good but, let's face it, neither has the gravitas needed to anchor the show.
i don't like headline hyperbole.
the only people who want to put in longer hours at the office have absolutely nothing to go home to.
they should be pitied instead of being vilified. drop them a "get well soon" message in social media should you encounter them.
i've never been comfortable with the usage of the term "outing gay men" in this specific fairly negative context.
their fallacy isn't being gay -- that by itself is nothing wrong and should never be associated with a public shaming exercise.
no, the problem in this scenario is their hypocrisy in denigrating other gay men for their activities while indulging in those activities themselves.
this whole series of events should be called "exposing the hypocrisy of loud-mouths" instead of "outing gay men".
i'm not clicking on a reddit link so this assertion may be wrong, but i don't think the case in the OP has anything to do with trump?
a team owned by an energy drinks marketer is interested in a pint of cola?
you may be right, but i first heard jimmy carr say it on an episode of qi.
big talk from someone with McSwag in their username!
... gas is a type of fluid.
that goes a long way in explaining some of those farts.
he likes big boats and he cannot lie.
i'm so sorry to hear that. hope you get something at home which can share in that abundant passion.
get well soon.