obre
I think it's mostly just content theft. On the audience end, viewers who aren't immediately put off by the reactor and are too lazy to find the original might just watch it. On the reuploader end, there's basically no effort involved and it can make them some money. Laziness is nothing new.
Does that apply to Netanyahu, Ben-Gvir, Gallant, and all the other Israeli war criminals?
Brother, I think you're confused. Falco is advocating for evidence based medicine, not whatever RFK Jr.'s smoking.
I guess commonplace decentralized pogroms like what happened to Jews and Roma throughout Europe historically
Considering their main export is genocide and dictatorship apologia, I do
Add a soyjak with an ushanka in the bottom frame next to the chud for extra accuracy
Let's start by acknowledging that previous presidents have been able to mitigate the worst excesses of Israel's genocide of Palestinians in the past and that the slaughter we're seeing right now is unprecedented and eclipses even the Nakba. Biden is a committed zionist and has willingly enabled this massive escalation of the genocide. Not only did he undemine Hillary Clinton's negotionations with Israel during Obama's administration, he has now sent two carrier groups to reinforce the IDF. A president with any spine or moral compass on the issue would have negotiated, and failing that, followed through on an escalating list of consequences similar to those imposed on apartheid-era South Africa. The US stands alone as the only major power in several organizations like the UN, G7, and NATO to ardently support Israel's genocide. That could end, but Biden would never do that.
Dem technocrats are drastically out of touch and don't realize how much aggrivement towards the status quo and desire for change there really is. Trump doesn't do policy and it doesn't matter because the people don't care about policy either. We live in turbulent times, and there's a groundswell of support for a nebulous 'change'. Trump positioned himself as anti-establishment, persecuted, and radical in a way that was appealing enough to retain his voter base. Meanwhile, Harris' institutionalism, focus on incrementalist policy, and boring rhetoric failed to galvanize support.
The gap
