nxdefiant

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago

Deplatforming isn't denying anyone their freedom of speech unless that platform is owned by some part of the US Government. That dog needs to RTFM.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Doesn't the far right coalition in Spain still control a terrifying amount power?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

Not shown: He's already started to burrow with his feet.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago

Too many docs in the drivussy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

yup, but that answer was based entirely on the assumptions present in the question. D is all divisible work, and C is everything else, because that's literally all you can assume to make the math work. D has to therefore be 12 months worth of divisible work minus C. C could very well be 12 months of work, meaning D is zero and adding more workers won't matter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Well, if T is total time to build, D is the time that can be distributed equally among any number of workers, and C is constant, indivisible time extra time that goes along with construction, and X is the number of workers, then:

T - C = D / X

so, since T is 12 and 6 is half of 12, then:

T/2 - C = D/X * 1/2

or

T/2 - C = D/2X where X > 0, C = 0, T=12, and D = (T - C) / X

which is both the answer it's looking for (twice as many workers) and the correct answer (it depends on at least two things we don't know), while assuming what they're assuming, which is C = 0

(Stupid ass junior high math problems piss me off, junior high is a traumatic experience)

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago

Get medical advice from a doctor, not a green text by a person who scissored their balls off in a hospital bathroom.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And then, one day, I got in.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's the coercion part. These people like their position in society and don't want to jeopardize it by taking your blanket, because the rules of society state you have the choice (if they take it) to use violence back without societal ramifications (probably by calling the cops). You get some decent perks by being a member of society, so we're all incentivised to maintain that membership.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

They could replace the skin with foam board, but all that weight savings would just let them reduce the battery to save more on the manufacturing costs.

FYI, it only weighs about 400lbs more than the F150 Lightning, so the skin probably doesn't add much weight over a traditional truck skin. The four wheel steering tech and glass roof probably add more.

view more: ‹ prev next ›