nurple

joined 1 year ago
[–] nurple 2 points 6 months ago

Please help me understand how "keep sending Netanyahu 2000lb bombs which he is using to kill children, doctors and journalists" is supposed to secure more votes than it loses.

I definitely do not think it does, and I agree with the rest of your post that neutrality would be a better path forward

[–] nurple 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The line he’s walking right now definitely isn’t working but saying that cutting support to Israel and sanctioning them “would pretty much guarantee” him the election just is not true at all (unfortunately). It’s not even close to true.

[–] nurple -1 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Biden could pretty much guarantee a win tomorrow by announcing that it has been determined that Israel is indeed committing war crimes, followed by cutting support for them as per the Law when the recipient of help is committing such crimes, ideally followed by sanctions.

I wish this was true but it very much isn't. He'd immediately lose Pennsylvania, at a minimum.

[–] nurple 2 points 6 months ago

Traditionally it meant Soviet apologists. Now it gets used more generally for the authoritarian left, where the horseshoe starts curving around.

[–] nurple 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

We should do whatever we can to keep people off of the tracks in the future. But that’s not mutually exclusive with pulling the lever right now, since the trolley is already heading towards people.

[–] nurple 1 points 8 months ago

Welcome to politics.

[–] nurple 1 points 8 months ago

Netanyahu won't agree to a permanent ceasefire. The hope seems to be to get any sort of long pause then push to extend and extend it so it is de facto permanent (and hope Netanyahu gets kicked out of power somewhere in there).

[–] nurple -1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Seems like they missed the lesson of the trolley problem, then.

[–] nurple 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've shifted to buying a lot of things used but I still can't wrap my head around buying used clothing most of the time. There is an overwhelming selection of choices, and even if I sift through all of that to find the sort of stuff I need chances are it isn't going to fit well.

Poshmark helps for some things, but only if it's like a discrete, easily categorized item that I can clearly for (like a specific brand of hat, or a specific line of pants from a specific brand that I already know fit). I'm appreciative of brands that have started carrying their own used clothing sections - even though it's usually more expensive it's so much easier to wrap my head around.

Contrast that with things like electronics or household items which I go used for all day every day. I needed a rice cooker, bought a used Zojirushi off a local guy within a week, easy as pie.

[–] nurple 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Depending on what sorts of stuff you're into there are situations where you can go over six without it being absurd. Like:

  • Everyday walkaround shoes
  • Running shoes
  • Hiking boots
  • Black dress shoes
  • Other color dress shoes
  • Sandals of some kind

That's already six pairs without even getting into other things that one may need like rain boots, snow boots, cleats, nonslips for work, etc.

[–] nurple 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Apparently I own 13 pairs of shoes. Damn.

I used to be way more consumer-y and I've been slowly reforming my ways. Case in point, two of those pairs are old running shoes repurposed into general beaters, and 10 of them were purchased 5+ years ago.

[–] nurple 29 points 11 months ago (10 children)

I agree with that statement, but I also don’t know how to define where the line is where consumption turns into overconsumption. Any ideas?

view more: next ›