nulluser

joined 2 years ago
[–] nulluser 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The paper, "Emergent Misalignment: Narrow fine-tuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMs,"

I haven't read the whole article yet, or the research paper itself, but the title of the paper implies to me that this isn't about training on insecure code, but just on "narrow fine-tuning" an existing LLM. Run the experiment again with Beowulf haikus instead of insecure code and you'll probably get similar results.

[–] nulluser 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] nulluser 4 points 2 weeks ago

Not spending money on the necessities is not saving money.

[–] nulluser 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Incorrect. Someone

Me

posited that China’s scientific achievements

alleged achievements

were merely propaganda,

No. If true, the achievements are achievements. Actual achievements aren't propaganda. However, the claims of the alleged achievements are coming from a country notorious for whitewashing history and making claims of scientific discoveries that later turn out to be optimistic at best, and often complete fabrications. So, skepticism of their claims of achievements (aka propaganda) is justified.

And that's what this thread, that I started, is about. Responding to a post about some alleged scientific breakthrough, stating that such claims should be taken with a big grain of salt (aka, skepticism).

YOU then moved the goalpost to try to argue about whether increased funding for scientific research leads to better results. We don't know that these results actually happened. We don't know that there was actually any increase in funding. All we know is that a notorious liar is claiming so. This thread was never about whether funding scientific research can lead to discoveries. It's about claims of discoveries from China are not reliable.

and I pointed out that they have invested heavily in research, which tends to produce outcomes.

And that's when you moved the goalpost, likely because you don't want to discuss China's history of lies and propaganda.

[–] nulluser 10 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

The discussion was about the unreliability of Chinese propaganda. You moved to funding scientific research. You didn't just move the goalpost a bit. You relocated it to a different city.

[–] nulluser 5 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Here's your logical fallacy.

[–] nulluser 24 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Skepticism of positive press (aka propaganda) from a country notorious for cracking down on negative press (i.e. any mention of Tiananmen Square) is not a phobia. It's completely justified.

[–] nulluser 47 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

Any announcements like this coming from China should be taken with a huge grain of salt the size of... China.

[–] nulluser 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Any of a million other people. For Luigi's case, it doesn't matter who did it. Luigi didn't, end of discussion.

[–] nulluser 3 points 2 weeks ago

Can't have positive results if you don't test, duh.

171
submitted 1 month ago by nulluser to c/news
 

If you want to understand the first few weeks of the second Trump administration, you should listen to what Steve Bannon told PBS’s “Frontline” in 2019:

Steve Bannon: The opposition party is the media. And the media can only, because they’re dumb and they’re lazy, they can only focus on one thing at a time. …

All we have to do is flood the zone. Every day we hit them with three things. They’ll bite on one, and we’ll get all of our stuff done. Bang, bang, bang. These guys will never — will never be able to recover. But we’ve got to start with muzzle velocity. So it’s got to start, and it’s got to hammer, and it’s got to —

Michael Kirk: What was the word?

Bannon: Muzzle velocity.

Muzzle velocity. Bannon’s insight here is real. Focus is the fundamental substance of democracy. It is particularly the substance of opposition. People largely learn of what the government is doing through the media — be it mainstream media or social media. If you overwhelm the media — if you give it too many places it needs to look, all at once, if you keep it moving from one thing to the next — no coherent opposition can emerge. It is hard to even think coherently.

Donald Trump’s first two weeks in the White House have followed Bannon’s strategy like a script. The flood is the point. The overwhelm is the point. The message wasn’t in any one executive order or announcement. It was in the cumulative effect of all of them. The sense that this is Trump’s country now. This is his government now. It follows his will. It does what he wants. If Trump tells the state to stop spending money, the money stops. If he says that birthright citizenship is over, it’s over.

Or so he wants you to think. In Trump’s first term, we were told: Don’t normalize him. In his second, the task is different: Don’t believe him.

Trump knows the power of marketing. If you make people believe something is true, you make it likelier that it becomes true. Trump clawed his way back to great wealth by playing a fearsome billionaire on TV; he remade himself as a winner by refusing to admit he had ever lost. The American presidency is a limited office. But Trump has never wanted to be president, at least not as defined in Article II of the U.S. Constitution. He has always wanted to be king. His plan this time is to first play king on TV. If we believe he is already king, we will be likelier to let him govern as a king.

10
Narwhals song (youtu.be)
9
AutoBackup killing z2m? (self.homeassistant)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by nulluser to c/homeassistant
 

I recently started using AutoBackup and every now and then, after it runs, zigbee2mqtt isn't running anymore and needs to be manually restarted. "Start on boot" and "Watchdog" are both enabled for z2m. Has anyone else experienced this?

I suppose I could add a step on to the backup automation to explicitly restart z2m, but I feel like that would just be a bandaid for a problem better fixed somewhere else. I just don't know where that might be.

 
 

Michael Saylor, co-founder and chairman of business intelligence firm MicroStrategy, has unveiled a comprehensive crypto framework aimed at further integrating Bitcoin and other digital assets into the US economy.

https://www.michael.com/digital-assets-framework

 

Once widely derided as a speculative asset with no intrinsic value, Bitcoin is being taken increasingly seriously by governments, financial institutions and investors alike.

 

A computer scientist has been found to have committed contempt of court for falsely and persistently claiming to be the mysterious inventor of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto.

In March, the High Court ruled Craig Wright was not Satoshi, and ordered him to stop claiming he was.

However, he continued to launch legal cases asserting he had intellectual property rights to Bitcoin, including a claim he was owed $1.2 trillion (£911 billion).

A judge said that amounted to a "flagrant breach" of the original court order and sentenced him to 12 months in prison, suspended for two years.

 

A computer scientist has been found to have committed contempt of court for falsely and persistently claiming to be the mysterious inventor of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto.

In March, the High Court ruled Craig Wright was not Satoshi, and ordered him to stop claiming he was.

However, he continued to launch legal cases asserting he had intellectual property rights to Bitcoin, including a claim he was owed $1.2 trillion (£911 billion).

A judge said that amounted to a "flagrant breach" of the original court order and sentenced him to 12 months in prison, suspended for two years.

 

archive link

NEW YORK, Dec 11 (Reuters) - In the days since Luigi Mangione was charged with murder for gunning down a top health insurance executive, more than a thousand donations have poured into an online fundraiser for his legal defense, with messages supporting him and even celebrating the crime.

...

Most of the messages on the crowd-sourced fundraising site GiveSendGo reflect a deep frustration shared by many Americans over the U.S. healthcare system - where some treatments and reimbursements can be denied to patients depending on their insurance coverage - as well as broader anger over rising income inequality and soaring executive pay.

 

The United States Supreme Court revealed what some justices touted as a landmark new ethics code last year.

But critics noted that the scandal-plagued institution’s new rules lacked any enforcement mechanisms, making them essentially a 14-page long list of suggestions.

A new leak of secret discussions from behind the bench, published in The New York Times Tuesday, reveals which justices fought to keep the code of conduct toothless.

The Times reported that the court’s nine justices started passing ultra-confidential memos, kept in paper envelopes and off email servers, back and forth at the end of last summer.

view more: next ›