nednobbins

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

Haha. Not specifically.

It's more a comment on how hard it is to separate truth from fiction. Adding glue to pizza is obviously dumb to any normal human. Sometimes the obviously dumb answer is actually the correct one though. Semmelweis's contemporaries lambasted him for his stupid and obviously nonsensical claims about doctors contaminating pregnant women with "cadaveric particles" after performing autopsies.

Those were experts in the field and they were unable to guess the correctness of the claim. Why would we expect normal people or AIs to do better?

There may be a time when we can reasonably have such an expectation. I don't think it will happen before we can give AIs training that's as good as, or better, than what we give the most educated humans. Reading all of Reddit, doesn't even come close to that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

That's my point. Some of them wouldn't even go through the trouble of making sure that it's non-toxic glue.

There are humans out there who ate laundry pods because the internet told them to.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago

They could have left out, "for LGBTQ+ people" and it would have been just as accurate.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 month ago (49 children)

This is why actual AI researchers are so concerned about data quality.

Modern AIs need a ton of data and it needs to be good data. That really shouldn't surprise anyone.

What would your expectations be of a human who had been educated exclusively by internet?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Hidden? That's literally the main argument when anyone surfaces a complaint about Biden. It's always some variation of, "If we let Trump into the White House again our democracy is over."

The hangup isn't awareness, it's acceptance. People aren't questioning that he'd try to be dictator for life, they doubt his ability to succeed. Once you've seen someone try something and fail it's reasonable to think they're just too incompetent to succeed.

Whenever I see people ask for support for the claim they're typically met with a hail of downvotes and name calling. That may feel righteous but it does absolutely nothing to recruit that person. Instead they'll walk away with even stronger convictions.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

It's true. Hamas is posting rookie numbers. They've got to up their death count by around 10x before they can be in Israel's league.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

That's the sister. Anon sounds like he has limited means. No need to make fun of them for being poor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

There is no single reason. It's the sum of many reasons. They're too many to list exhaustively but when we see a concrete example the vast majority of people come to the same conclusion on creepy vs appropriate.

When there isn't a clear line, trying to define one is misleading. You can always find some couple somewhere on earth with an arbitrarily large age gap where people will agree that it's the result of informed consent. People then try to make the argument that this justifies all relationships with that age gap even though most relationships don't have whatever extenuating circumstances made the one example palatable.

Large age gaps are creepy. Whenever someone has to ask if a particular age gap is also creepy the answer is almost always, "Yes."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There's not much to discuss. The vast majority of the time it's creepy grooming and we all know it. It's technically legal and there may be cases when it's genuinely a case of consent and mutual attraction but those are the exceptions.

Attempts to find the exact line are futile. "Half your age plus seven" is a rule of thumb, not a clear border.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Lindt is pretty good as packaged chocolate goes. You can always find some fancy artisanal chocolatier if you can afford to spend a few bucks per chocolate but for a HS student Lindt is pretty high tier.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The girls themselves are mostly "all for it" when it's people roughly their age. There are exceptions but most girls that age see 30+ year olds as lame old dudes. Most 30+ year olds aren't going after high school girls either. That's why we all cringed at David Woodson's line in "Dazed and Confused".

The people who don't want them to "exert this right" are the responsible parents, friends and community who know that a 30+ year old dating a teenager is creepy AF.

The few people who actually support this are mostly rationalizing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

TIL about John Wolf.

At the time, it never would have occurred to me that each one was different or that there was beatboxing involved.

view more: ‹ prev next ›