natarey

joined 1 year ago
[–] natarey -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I'm sure. Enjoy your nuggies!

Edit: Wow, you added so many big words! Did momma forget your sauce again?

Hey, you’re an expert: do you think the uptick in the number of sticky-fingered midwesterners around here is a sign that Lemmy’s finally reaching a wider, less technical audience?

[–] natarey 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I will never understand why Americans insist on simping so hard for billion dollar companies. Is it the lead in the drinking water? Is it the lack of healthcare? Is is the terrible state of their education? Truly baffling.

[–] natarey 1 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Just like every piece of AI-generated slop!

[–] natarey 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, you’re more optimistic than I am, but I hope you’re right.

The whole internet feels like it’s in a state of irrecoverable rot, and the last ten years have really tanked my confidence in governments to do anything about the clearly harmful, consumer hostile behavior inflicted on us — mostly because they seem to benefit a lot from letting Meta et al. do whatever they want. Like, EU fines, to date, have looked more like the organization wanting to wet their beak rather than fixing anything. I don’t know.

[–] natarey 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I was counting from when Facebook et al. became a clear problem — because, again, while I’m glad the EU is looking at this, it’s the US that has needed to take action. Their refusal to do so has left it to the EU to try to do something, and I’m skeptical that whatever they end up doing will make a difference. Like, if the price of the crime is a fine, then the crime is legal for a company as big as Meta.

[–] natarey 3 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Justified? Absolutely. Timely? Hardly.

My point was it’s more than a decade too late, and all the EU will do is levy a minor fine that Meta won’t even blink at. The only country that could impose real consequences is the US, and they have no interest in anything that doesn’t benefit these nightmare cyberpunk megacorps.

[–] natarey 5 points 3 months ago (9 children)

This is like an article declaring, "EU Investigates MySpace for causing child addiction and harm" -- the people they're trying to protect don't use that product any more. The time to do this investigation was fifteen years ago, and the US government should have been the ones to do it.

Don't get me wrong -- fuck Facebook. I hope they have to pay billions. But the people that company is harming now are adults and the elderly. I'm sure fifteen years from now, once all those people are dead, there'll be an in-depth investigation and legislation about it.

[–] natarey 0 points 3 months ago

The FTC will take ten years to accomplish nothing of value -- and even whatever fig-leaf ruling they issue will be sued into oblivion, or voided by the Supreme Court.

Privacy is dead because killing it was in the interest of too many wealthy and powerful companies, government agencies, and individuals for it to have ended up any other way.

[–] natarey 4 points 3 months ago

This is the kind of fucked up joke I'm here for.

[–] natarey 59 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Don't buy shitty Chinese EVs, buy the somehow even shittier American EVs!

[–] natarey 7 points 3 months ago

Head Tap Meme Can't get called out by game reviewers if there's no functional games media.

There's very little decent media criticism of any kind left thanks to the ongoing media implosion, and games media is especially unprofitable.

view more: next ›