Very helpful clarification, thank you.
lemmyman
joined 2 years ago
The nice thing about this style of communication is that it makes the context explicit, so I can at least look up what you're talking about. You know, when I have access to a means to search the entirety of a civilization's works.
Circuit breakers are on the hot lines, there isn't a case where high currents "bypass the breaker" (except for a bad install, which for this specific scenario wouldn't have anything to do with whether the neutral is connected to earth or not).
AFCI and GFCI breakers will care about the return path, but that is in addition to normal circuit breaker "does this exceed the current limit" behavior. And it is a very important reason not to connect the neutral to ground at the appliance level
No, I mean where the white neutral wire connects to the main bonding jumper on the panel in the right side of the image.
I'm not sure where we are missing each other here. My reference is NEC in the US, are you in a different part of the world?
Yes, and with the neutral connected to ground at the service entrance
Ironic comment for an ironic community
I can agree with all of that and still think it looks like the casino saying "uh, no we don't want to pay you." I think something is missing.
Maybe the key point is that the payout value displayed on the screen is, say, "derived" and not the "ground truth." If you get cherry-coin-grape and that's worth $2 but the display says $42 million, it better be well-established that cherry-coin-grape is the deciding output and not the display.
What if you get triple-treasure-chests and the casino says nah that's a display bug, it was really cherry-coin-grape internally. Where's the line here? Im sure it is legally established but of course shitty news articles aren't going to go to that level of detail when they can quote the plaintiffs attorney instead
That makes it so obvious, thanks
Sounds better to me
I think you are looking for a caliper
So bad it might fit in on dataisbeautiful