"OH YEAH? FUCK YOU! I AGREE WITH YOU!!!!!"
laughterlaughter
joined 1 year ago
Ok, ok. Now I'm in learning mode. And I mean it. I guess I don't know what "horny bait" means. Care to elaborate?
Think whatever you want. At this point I'm just repeating what I said in other comments.
I find Futurama's Leela fuckable. She has a hot body. Jessica Rabbit too. Scarlet Johanson, Sharon Stone and Hally Berry as well. Don't get me started with the Westworld robots, or the porcelain ballerina figurines.
My point is, of course I'm attracted to sexy women's hot bodies! And the cheetah was drawn with a woman's (read: human's) sexy body, so yes, I see it is attractive. Did you want to catch me in an "aha!" moment? I would be saying the same argument about "horny stuff" if the lady of "the lady and the tramp" was sucking a banana up and down "because she likes the feeling of bananas going in and out her mouth" - I'd find that sexual (though not attractive, as I'm only attracted to women.) That doesn't mean I have a furry fetish.
Have you, truly, ever stepped outside and seen a womens figure? Are they just horny bait to you?
Straw man.
Eh.... it's a comics community. This is all entertainment to me.
(I didn't downvote you, by the way.)
The only "sexy" character is a gazelle, in which being sexy is the point - not because it's furry, but because it's part of the story (they could have been humans, robots or books and it would have been the same - a sexy character must be conveyed as sexy somehow.)
But nope, zootopia is not horny. I guess you're referring to Judy, who is a law enforcement officer and she looks fit. She doesn't look sexy, though, or "humanly sexy." That would be... gross, considering it's a children's movie.
lol indeed! I thought of adding "remove the tail" after posting, thinking that maybe no one would notice, but I was wrong.
Your comment is weird. The point of the test is to fool humans. Humans were fooled. What does it have to do with measurement and Goodhart's law?
Yes. Replace the cop's head with a human head, and say she's wearing gloves. Now you have a sexy cop.
I have to agree with OP's assessment.
I've heard people say "omg chatgpt so stoopid, not the point of the Turing test" lately.
To me, that's moving the goalpost.
The Turing test is about fooling a human being into thinking he/she is interacting with another human being.
Does this happen? Yes. 100%. Or at least almost 100% (because not everyone is fooled.)
Now, the whole thing about chatgpt being stupid, etc, well.... that's another matter.
Come up with another test. Name it the Goofy test, or whatever.
How do you deal with Firefox updates?
It was a joke. It was a funny joke. She didn't take it as such. Oh well.
I laughed out loud at your predicament!
as if it lost its* spark.