Really???? Hahahaha I would love to see this!
No problem. I did have to tweak my final version of this as I also wanted a single template to do a bit more than just capture the decision and brief context as to why.
I think this is what most people do but as I mentioned on another comment, it was suggested to me to do threat models instead or as an addition (I forgot which way the person pitched it to me). So naturally, I was curious to see if anyone else actually did that as it seems like this would be a significant effort.
Well that is a great point. I had a conversation with a Gartner analyst (I know I’m trying to remain unbiased) recently and he suggested doing threat modeling and reviewing periodically (at least annually) as a means of “keeping up with threats and changing landscape”. I thought that sounded great… on paper. Practicality this would be extremely time consuming to keep up to date ff or each system/control in my opinion.
Came here to suggest the same as @[email protected]. I also just created a community dedicated to Security Architecture. Feel free to subscribe and engage there too if you'd like.
I’ve been playing around with Nobara. Coming from Fedora, I always felt like I didn’t have “everything I needed to run games properly”. Followed a few tutorials on YouTube to set up my Fedora (f36+) box for gaming but that feelining of incompleteness never left. Since installing Nobara, I’ve realized that my “feeling” was absolutely right! Nobara basically installed a bunch of other gaming things I never even knew I needed for basic gaming (codecs, other nvidia software, ProtonUp-QT, etc). Nice easy step through style setup. Using the KDE version and so far, I’m staying with Nobara. Just my opinion.
I must be way behind. What happen with RH? I just migrated a bunch of servers to Alma , albeit not in prod but still.