No, because it's an extraordinary claim.
jungle
joined 2 years ago
Ah, gotcha, and I agree
That is the extraordinary evidence being referenced.
Sorry, you misunderstood my comment, which was very badly worded.
I meant to imply that you, an experienced developer, didn't get "scammed" by the LLM, and that the difference between you and the dev you mentioned is that you know how to program.
I was trying to make the point that the issue is not the LLM but the developer using it.
Did you get scammed by the LLM? If not, what's the difference between you and the dev you mentioned?
Stopped reading after the first paragraph.
[Self driving cars] Waymo eyes S.F. robotaxi expansion, personal vehicles after first-year ‘success’
No bed to go as far back as 2014 to get a basic analog car
It seems to me that almost all native English speakers got principal and principle backwards. I'm actually surprised when I see them used correctly (which is not the case here).
Now in English please.
For how he won.
President Trump announced his intention to ensure that all future bitcoin production would take place within the United States, should he be re-elected.
facepalm
Saying you know who Satoshi is, that's the claim, and that's an extraordinary claim.