Certainly sounds more interesting than my original read of it! Sorry about that, I was grumpy.
jeeva
joined 2 years ago
I don't understand how you could understand how LLMs work, and then write this.
Machines can learn that...
Ah, nevermind.
If you'll excuse me saying, I feel that you are the one who is looking at something and extrapolating.
The things you are describing sound like if-statement levels of automation, GitHub Actions with preprogrammed responses rather than LLM whatever.
If you're worrying about being replaced by that... Go find the code, read it, and feel better.
I feel like you may be arguing with someone who is making an Always Sunny reference.
I'm not saying everything in the world has been done, but "what, like Tiny Tina's Wonderlands?"
Wow, I didn't realise that was still about! I'm tempted to go check it out again!
Ha, me'tal gymnastics.
Yeah, though a nice thing for those who need it my immediate worry was "well, this may mean companies lean further into tipping because yay tax free" rather than working towards just paying workers.
Humtum.
Yes, people are being forced to use it if they want to, for instance, search using Google or Bing.
As the parent comment suggested, or there's no way to opt out, currently.
I'm glad you see value in it; I think the injection of LLM queries into search results I want to contain accurate results (and nothing more) a useless waste of power.
Yeah, what's the jokey parable thing?
A CTO is at lunch when a call comes in. There's been a huge outage, caused by a low level employee pressing the wrong button.
"Damn, you going to fire that guy?"
"Hell no, do you know how much I just spent on training him to never do that again?"
()
Just spotted you mention it on bsky! I've queued it up, and will be jumping on a train to London later so will have a moment hopefully!
Thank you for mentioning it here!
How about two drinks, plus a free drink from the airline you're flying per half hour delayed? Seems more reasonable.