ichbinjasokreativ

joined 1 year ago
[–] ichbinjasokreativ 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was talking about myself. Telling someone else they didn't understand the joke while failing to understand theirs myself

[–] ichbinjasokreativ 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] ichbinjasokreativ 6 points 1 week ago

No. AMD and Intel have a bunch of legally binding agreements that allow each other to manufacture CPUs that are essentially 100% compatible architecture-wise. You can install any OS on an Intel CPU, replace that CPU with one from AMD and expect things to work just the same (talking compatibility, not performance) and vice versa. The 64bit extension for the x86 architecture was created by and is patented by AMD. Intel are able to use that extension in any of their processors without paying royalties, but AMD are the owners of that specific technology. The contracts between these two companies also dictate that those contracts need to be renegotiated in case either company gets bought out, which makes me think that qualcomm would only care about buying intel because it would allow them to essentially permanently deadlock all negotiations and thus kill the x86 architecture, immediatly handing the entire CPU industry to ARM and, going by market share, themselves.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ 8 points 1 week ago

It is a hard requirement and thus part of the experience.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Change in leadership would also mean that the deal with AMD would have to be renegotiated, meaning that intel under qualcomm would not be legally able to create new 64-bit CPUs.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm just saying that the romans stopped putting bears into fights in the colloseum because it got boring - the bears qust wrecked everything else the romans could get their hands on.

Or so I've heard, I'm not a historian.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ 1 points 1 week ago

They technically do tell you, even in the graphical software store. And the speed difference between snaps and debs has been largely nullified by now.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

you can install firefox, but even if you click 'make firefox my default browser', it won't. It will open the settings, wait a second and then show you another button. Clicking that will do what you wanted - for web links. Pdf files? Html files? Searches from the start menu? Still all open edge.

On ubuntu it takes maybe a minute to remove the firefox snap, add the mozilla repo and install from there. Those dummie packages are more for convenience than anything nefarious. I agree that snaps have been made unavoidable if you're not paying attention, but I disagree that it's a bad thing. Ubuntu is migrating from .debs to snaps, so it makes sense that those become ever more prominant.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

They do not prevent you from adding repos and installing from those. They don't even try to make it slightly more difficult to do so than it was before. Microsoft force you to use edge. Cannot really disable it. Can't remove it. Can't simply switch away from it. See the difference?

[–] ichbinjasokreativ 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You know that these are ai generated, right?

view more: ‹ prev next ›