hyperhopper

joined 2 years ago
[–] hyperhopper 3 points 6 days ago

I do not think any of the 3 that I mentioned are likely. But that is the world view the parent comment assumes, and my comment is just continuing his assumption but showing why his extrapolations are incorrect

[–] hyperhopper 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

3 terms is 12 years. 2+4+4 is not 12

[–] hyperhopper 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is a situation that implies he is either impeached , resigned, or dead, so I'm not sure what his interpretation has to do with this conversation

[–] hyperhopper 5 points 6 days ago (7 children)

He would at most get 2.49999 terms. You have not read the 22nd amendment. You can't get 3 terms aside from repeatedly being elected as VP and the primary president losing office 4+ times.

[–] hyperhopper 0 points 2 weeks ago

You are making up definitions and are incorrect

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brogrammer

It's not just "a male nerd"

[–] hyperhopper 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

What part of him was bro-ey? He cared only about progressing technology and aiding civic causes. He was an activist, not a tech bro slamming champagne at cloud 9 in Aspen or throwing parties in a villa in Florida.

Also, when you say somebody is something, you have to give a reason. You can't just say "why aren't they that?"

[–] hyperhopper 3 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

He was not a tech bro

[–] hyperhopper 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not execs, read the OP. The theory is GL got scared of fan reactions to jarjar so he didn't want to make jarjar that central.

[–] hyperhopper 0 points 9 months ago

Having the tools and knowledge to keep yourself safe does not make you radicalized. That's like saying learning how to swim or getting a boat means you were radicalized by water. Or learning first aid makes you a radicalized combat medic.

Getting a gun is a much less radical plan than changing countries....

[–] hyperhopper 78 points 9 months ago (17 children)

I want an actual real time strategy game. All popular RTSs are actually just about tactics and micro. I mean every SC2 guide will tell you that up to a very high level of play, if you're just doing more you'll be more efficient and win regardless of strategy. Why can't you just set a standing order of "make unit x" or "make unit x while we have gas until we get to 50 of them"? That's strategy. Having to tab back to a building and manually queue a couple of units every several seconds is just creating busywork for players, but thats what's necessary and optimal for playing SC2 and most RTS games well

[–] hyperhopper 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why should this be at the editor level? There should be a linter that applies all these stylistic formatting changes to all files automatically. If the developer's own editing tools or personal workflow have a chance to introduce non-standard styles to the codebase, you have a deeper problem.

[–] hyperhopper 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You just havent seen much true multimedia, what the web was originally optimized for. You've just seen designer barf and marketing's wet dreams, but not sites actually meant to convey information efficiency.

Text, videos, images, and interactive elements are all individually not that great. The magic is when you can have all of them on one page, each for the parts where they are the best option for part of a whole idea.

But that doesn't jive well with medium that just wants everything to be text, or YouTube/TikTok that wants everything to be a video, etc.

view more: next ›