huntrss

I found this article also very interesting: https://extremelearning.com.au/unreasonable-effectiveness-of-quasirandom-sequences/

It focusses more or less on one sequence but provides use cases and in-depth knowledge

Didn't read all, however, thanks for sharing. Made me laugh and I certainly needed a good laugh today

C'mon, a little bit of flexing is so nice.

But, I get what you're saying. I usually filter out this bullshit (because I'm a Rustacean myself 😜) but this doesn't mean that it is as easy for someone else as it is for me.

I thought as well: should be sway ;)

For all of you, who want to start neovim, or just started (nyself included) than kickstart.nvim is a great start: https://github.com/nvim-lua/kickstart.nvim

I think they also live after the mantra "move fast and break things", in cars that literally means breaking bones.

Fair enough. There are pretty pedantic processes to qualify automotive software, but these are obviously not perfect and bad quality software may still be deployed to the cars.

However, I would not throw OEMs like Tesla and others into the same category regarding Software quality.

How do you mean this?

I assume so

Automotive, Aerospace. Everywhere where you need safety qualifiable software (safety as in ISO 26262 or equivalent)

Thanks

Interesting. Can you provide a good link regarding generational index?