halfelfhalfreindeer

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] halfelfhalfreindeer 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a political view though, not a philosophical one, unless it has a philosophical underpinning.

[–] halfelfhalfreindeer 8 points 1 year ago

"He's so gay" was far less frowned upon in 2003. Shit changes.

[–] halfelfhalfreindeer 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Eating factory farmed meat. With the way politics is headed there will be some politician at some point in the future trying desperately to defend his high beef consumption in what will become known as Burgergate.

Also, islamophobia in the context of defending religious nutjobs. For instance, it is islamophobic to complain about a muslim (Sikh, in reality) man at an airport because he "looks like a terrorist". It is not islamophobic to suggest that female students should be allowed in public schools just like male students. Both of these things have actually happened, very recently, and the latter was defended because people were scared shitless of being called islamophobic. We have to have some minimum human rights standards that religion cannot interfere with, and blatant sex-based discrimination is one of them. I do not give a flying fuck what your religion teaches you.

[–] halfelfhalfreindeer 55 points 2 years ago (5 children)

No, it's not just the taxes, though that's obviously a component of it. A quick google search will lead you to find that they are obligated by law to directly contribute to Russia's military efforts by registering its draft-eligible staff, turning over information relevant to the war, assisting in the delivery of military equipment, and providing physical infrastructure, among other things.

Ukrainian or not, this isn't just "oh well you're kind of indirectly supporting the war by funding the government". It is a very direct form of involvement.

[–] halfelfhalfreindeer 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Where do you live?

[–] halfelfhalfreindeer 15 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Frankly that's an excuse, and a lazy one at that. Ethical products are widely available outside of the US, and I say this as a digital nomad who has lived on three continents and lived in the US for less than a year in total. If the inconvenience is unbearable for you then that's your prerogative, but don't try to justify it by saying things that simply aren't true and thereby discouraging others.

[–] halfelfhalfreindeer 24 points 2 years ago (14 children)

These are pretty common products. There are tons of ethical alternatives, in fact personal care items are among the easiest and cheapest products to find ethical alternatives for and a good starting point if you want to develop more ethical consumption habits. You don't need to make your own soap in order to avoid sponsoring genocide.

[–] halfelfhalfreindeer 2 points 2 years ago

You're definitely right on the cyclic thing - you can get a lot of stuff for free or close to it. It always used to blow my mind that parents would pay actual money for baby clothes. Like... there are SO many second hand ones out there, and they're going to grow out of it in a month.

[–] halfelfhalfreindeer -1 points 2 years ago

Underrated comment.

[–] halfelfhalfreindeer 2 points 2 years ago

Ouch, that sucks. I only had a handful of things from my dad when he died and that was already too much, especially the sentimental stuff. I allow myself a small box of trinkets, but if I'm honest I hate sentimentality and the fact that I would be upset if I lost those items even though it's completely irrational. Having to deal with a whole lifetime's worth of stuff would be overwhelming. I wouldn't even know where to start. Every dress that hasn't been worn in 20 years and box of random papers that are damn near impossible to trace. Luckily I have some packrat siblings who I'm sure will scoop up a lot, but I dread having to clean up shop when my mom dies.

[–] halfelfhalfreindeer 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not judging or anything, but this is one of the many reasons why I'd never have kids. A lot of people just have kids because they're on autopilot in their lives, and then all of a sudden they realize it's completely incompatible with their lifestyle. I think that contributes to the popularity of being child free within minimalist circles. I grew up with younger siblings and can remember moving with them a few times, and the physical volume of stuff that such a tiny human needs is crazy, as is the immense marketing pressure on parents to buy stupid shit. It's super predatory to see companies pressure parents into buying the most expensive car seat because otherwise their baby won't be as safe. They can fuck off. Imagine gatekeeping safety, real or imagined, based so directly on money.

[–] halfelfhalfreindeer 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Why on earth would anyone oppose this? The only people who gain are companies who are ok with distracting you so that you pay attention to their commercial.

view more: ‹ prev next ›