h0rnman

joined 1 year ago
[–] h0rnman 6 points 1 year ago

Yo, please tag this NSFW.... we didn't come here to see this kind of smut

[–] h0rnman 1 points 1 year ago

I'll also add to this that WSL is a security nightmare. If something manages to dig its way into your wsl install and add, for example, WINE, there's no end to the (hidden to your av) mischief it can enact.

[–] h0rnman 1 points 1 year ago

I was just saying that there can be a lot of good reasons for downtime. Heck, I use a secondary in my network because sometimes my unraid host starts dnsmasq and it clobbers my adguard container

[–] h0rnman 2 points 1 year ago

Depending on the client, it can be. The Microsoft page pretty cleanly defines expected dns client behavior [https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-server/networking/dns-client-resolution-timeouts#what-is-the-default-behavior-of-a-windows-7-or-windows-8-dns-client-when-two-dns-servers-are-configured-on-the-nic](Microsoft learn). There haven't been any published changes to this that I've seen, and it more or less matches my experience. Linux is a lawless land in this respect, but it really boils down to "it might", so caveat emptor there. That's also why I suggested a public ad blocking dns server as a secondary, in case multicast dns does its multicast dns thing

[–] h0rnman 2 points 1 year ago

No worries, I had the same thought at first and was very confused for a minute

[–] h0rnman 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

OP already said that their current DHCP solution (the router) can't push multiple DNS servers. Having a good secondary can be really helpful for things like power blips, maintenance windows, and cats pulling power cables. There are a few solutions that also do ad blocking that can make good secondaries

[–] h0rnman 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This would be great except OP said that their router can't push 2 DNS addresses. Otherwise, ya, redundant services is always best

[–] h0rnman 3 points 1 year ago

If you already have pihole in your environment, I would just use that. DHCP is pretty light weight, so the pi should be more than capable, and you don't want to complicate your core services more than you need to

[–] h0rnman 1 points 1 year ago

And make sure you save some of that pasta water to add to your sauce. A tablespoon or two helps emulsify the oils and gives it a thicker consistency without ruining its ability to cover the pasta. It also gives the sauce a bit of "noodliness" to help the flavors gel

[–] h0rnman 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

PRV? Not sure what that is or where i would find it

[–] h0rnman 3 points 1 year ago

So I've already done this one. Exactly according to the link posted a bit further down but no dice. I'm really confused as to why this only seems tied to the hot water though

[–] h0rnman 1 points 1 year ago

I'll add to the dogpile here as well. I generally recommend that any "persistent" disk be mounted in fstab. Not only does this bypass user-space mounting layers (which have been known to have performance issues), it also allows you to ensure deterministic device to path mappings by using UUID. You also get the benefits of consistent mount options regardless of what the distro maintainers do to the fuse defaults

view more: ‹ prev next ›