guojing

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Most "journalists" are at zero risk because they just parrot what their governments say.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Thanks for proving my point, even that article doesnt have a single mention of the word genocide.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (10 children)

What an interesting wikipedia article about Jenin Camp. Apparently the refugees just appeared out of thin air. No mention where they come from, or what forced them to flee from home. Its time we leave that propaganda website behind.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There were 14.000 civilians killed in Donbass by the Kiev regime. As your quote says, "this is what is called a genocide". And genocide often happens during wartime, so the fact that there was a civil war does not preclude a genocide at all.

So you admit that the chemical weapons claims were invented. Then why was no one punished for those false allegations which resulted in millions of deaths? Why wasnt the CIA dissolved, and reparations paid to the innocent Iraqi people? Is that what you call justice?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Chemical weapons in Iraq clearly didnt exist. Remember Colin Powell presenting washing powder as "chemical weapons" at the UN? That was the only proof ever given. Russia will doubtlessly present proof for its claims once the war is over, and then we can see if it was true.

If Russia joined the war for imperialist reasons, that means they were planning to profit financially. How do they profit if they know that they were going to be sanctioned severely? Its much easier to believe that they were concerned about their security, considering that Ukraine threatened to acquire nuclear weapons just a few days earlier.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

And who else was going to stop the genocide that Ukraine carried out against ethnic Russians for 8 years? Diplomacy certainly failed, so Russia had no other option left.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yes, U.S. and NATO were "preaching for deescalation" while shipping millions of dollars worth of weapons to Ukraine. All while deploying "instructors" and supporting a planned Ukronazi attack on Donbass republics. Of course Russia wasnt just gonna watch and let that happen.

Russia also offered diplomatic solutions many times (since December, and in fact since 2014). Those were all rejected, and now it seems that the time for diplomacy is over.

Edit: forgot to add, just a few days ago Ukraine threatened to develop nuclear weapons. That was obviously a red line for Russia.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Russia was not going to wait for the Ukronazi offensive, but decided to attack first. Now its time to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine. No clear confirmation of a Russian ground invasion, the attack was carried out with artillery and air strikes on military targets (and very effectively).

view more: ‹ prev next ›