gunnersaurus

He hasn't taken off like we'd hope, that's for sure. But I do see more talent with him than I ever did with Lokonga. While Vieira can get bullied out of games, I do see good flashes when he comes on as a sub and doesn't overthink things. (He's more aggressive and progressive in those instances, especially when we're losing or tied with a lesser side.) To be honest, I think Vieira is also a level below what we want from our backups now (given our ambition and investments), but I see him as more likely to come good. At least he's probably retained more of his value than Sambi if we were to sell him -- though I would be surprised if we did this window.

Agreed on all counts!

I'm pretty sure that's what happened. City really spooked us, and we may have been surprised by Rice's level of interest in them.

It's just that of late we seemed to have a Plan B ready to go if a team played hardball with us (like with the Mudryk saga). This deal feels very different: we're letting West Ham kind of run the show here. Arteta clearly values Rice exceptionally high, but it feels like a real divergence from our recent deal-making.

It's a bummer he hasn't worked out, but I wouldn't slate him. The move to us might have come too early for him. I never really saw the talent -- he seems tidy at times but also has a lot of difficulty with positioning and plays timidly -- but it was a low-risk gamble and he's been professional to my knowledge. Things can of course change, but I would be fine with him seeking opportunities elsewhere. Hopefully we can get a fee that's not too much lower than what we paid!

That seems rather quick for such a high fee. I'd have to think that will make more transfers difficult this year and next (esp. getting another midfielder). We really wanted to get this one over the line.

I still have mixed feelings about this deal. Great player, no doubt, but this does feel like a win-now move with a lot of backfire potential, rather than the steady, shrewd, long-term squad building that has produced great results the past couple of years. Maybe we are at that level now where this is what it takes to continue moving forward, but I guess I just really enjoyed this past season and don't want to be hurt again by misplaced hope and expectation. :P

At that fee, I am back to hating sportswashing. The but is withdrawn and the undue sense of morality is preserved.

Linux Mint may look a bit outdated and doesn't benefit from the Latest and Greatest version of some programs (ala Arch), but it still provides an excellent out of the box experience. It's been my daily driver for a production environment for years, and I've converted older family members to use it as their daily driver without issues. (They prefer it over Windows!)

I did recently encounter a bug where it would fail to install the latest version if Secure Boot was enabled at the time of installation, but that was due to a key signing issue/expiration from upstream (Ubuntu) and the developers have already promised a new approach that would address and future-proof that in the upcoming version. It was my first time in years I hit a stumbling block on installation.

That aside, the onboarding process has only gotten better and is now outstanding. (It has a little Welcome program that walks you through setting up system snapshots, proprietary drivers, and even enable automatic security updates. It's accessible and actually helpful to newcomers.) The distribution upgrade utility is simple, works well, and does a good job of nudging when it's time to upgrade (without making you feel forced). It also anchors to Ubuntu LTS releases, which means you actually don't need to upgrade often if the feature set does the job for you. In terms of usability, I think we hit the Year of the Linux Desktop a while ago (for general productivity users).

In short, I have absolutely no hesitation in recommending Mint to someone who is either new or willing to give up some of the bleeding edge opportunities for stability, and I think it has been able to consistently deliver an excellent out of box experience for years now.

Make it happen for the memes, Edu! And his compilation videos better be set to Pitbull.

Okay, I'm not a fan of sportswashing, but...

I think that's dependent on Rice's willingness to go to another team. He doesn't want to cause a stink (take note, Balogun!), but I think he'd press internally if a bid is close the valuation, and WHU might give in since he's been a very good servant. Let's hope!

I thought the first offer was 80m total?

I've seen different numbers bandied about but that's the figure Romano quoted recently. He wasn't clear if that was only the up-front part or the total, but I'd think it's the latter and find it unfathomable that Arsenal would make a worse offer the second time around for their top target. I genuinely expect we upped the bid by 10 million, but focused on add-ons, which WHU understandably might not have liked.

I expect West Ham are just waiting out City, and it'll put the ball with Rice who will hopefully maintain a steadfast commitment to play for Arsenal.

I'd be surprised if we go much higher, especially if the player is set on us. It is not a lowball/disrespectful bid that would be insulting to player and team, and thus make him willing to see out his West Ham contract. West Ham don't have anything to gain by moving quickly, after all.

Hopefully, just another couple of weeks of back and forth and this will be settled not much higher than this bid.