Wow. Heaven forbid I used a joke from the largest online chess influencers following when there are multiple threads on this post from the same community...
Now I am confused about if you get the joke or not.
Formative and summative assessments need metrics by which we can demonstrate successful learning objectives and the degree to which those learning objectives were accomplished. Theoretically grades are supposed to represent the degree to which a student's advancement between formative and summative assessments demonstrates a student's progress in mastery of the learning objectives. At their core, across all students they represent the successes and failures of the teacher, the learning materials and teaching methods. Provided that a significant number of students show sufficient success and the grading mechanics are not compromised, these grades are a reasonable approximation of an individuals progress through the learning objectives.
Now... Obviously there are just a plethora of problems in practice across educational institutions. Most schools abjectly fail at any form of reasonable formative assessment and compromised grading (favoritism) is rampant which results in systemic failure of adequate assessment (grading) mechanics and a next to complete breakdown of objective assessments throughout the system. This provides fertile ground for corruption from external pressures (school funding and management cronyism/job security). The result is systemic grade inflation.
When grade inflation is rampant, it provides an othering mechanic for the social hierarchies present in the institutions that is sufficiently backed by science to be unassailable by the average participant... Even though due to poor implementation it should be rather meaningless.
I... Mean... You obviously don't, but whatever.
Sorry. I apologize.
It's frustrating trying to explain the same thing over and over again...
The tokens are how drm works. The process of DRM is token validation and enforcement of intellectual property rights granted by tokens.
I don't know how else to explain it. It feels like I am back at my original post. I don't know if you understand any better or if you still have misconceptions about what NFTs are or what DRM is or if you still think there is some magic in NFTs.
How would using blockchain fix the liquidity of a bank?
What's en passant?
Yes, in theory that would work. But they actually make main disconnect switches for this in the event that the main breaker fails. It's a mandatory install in all grid tie electrical generator systems (including solar).
Again, all of this already existed and will continue to exist with or without blockchain. There is very little novel in the implementation details of the tokens. The people who got the idea for "nft"s didn't come up with a new idea. This isn't some new math. The only portion of NFTs that is new is the cooperative signing... Which again, isn't a new concept either.
Right now, everything you described... Literally all of it... Ubisoft implements for their launcher and enforce with their drm solution.
The whoosh is part of the joke... Which apparently you didn't know. Also, it isn't insular. It's literally the opposite of that. I thought they were participating in the joke until they replied in such a negative way.
I don't understand why you are so upset about this and why you are so derogatory towards what is potentially the largest generation of chess players proportionally to their generation size to have ever existed.