People will decide what is best for them. Blocking access to websites for having ad blocker or having no ad blocker is an asshole move. I know it is intended for pun, but still.
faintedheart
joined 11 months ago
I have used motorola, xiaomi, samsung, realme and htc. Every one of them had this issue.
How the fuck an immigrant became a republican? His name looks like an Indian. If republican people have absolute power these kind of people won't even be able to touch their foot in the USA.
Paying less than 10$ a month for mobile data with unlimited 4g (5g unlimited in this plan for the testing phase). Living in a third world country. Wifi connection is unlimited at 100mbps speed at almost the same amount.
Vape is also bad for you. Lungs are designed to take oxygen.
What?? How??
I heard torrents.
There should be an option to see all posts on our feed from all our instances. Then when commenting choose the instance from which the comment has to be posted.
Modern problems require modern solutions. They deleted the data. Now unemployment disappeared. Also the people who posted the data.
There are many sites that allow downloading. And VPN's are very much lower in price to subscribe compared to those streaming services.
Streaming through apps has terrible quality most of the time based on their server loads etc. Even with fastest internet steaming from Disney+ quality is shit most of the time. When I am torrenting, i can get a high quality print and can watch it without any issue or buffering. It takes a few minutes to download a few gb's. I am from a third world country and the internet here is so fast to download movies in 5 minutes max.
view more: next ›
Encouraging and forcing is different. Just because forcing ad blocker on people is aligned with so many people's view doesn't mean that it is a great move. Anything that is forced on people is an asshole move.