Genuinely they are fascinating. I do cosplay and I have gotten a lot ideas and pointers from furries.
They've solved so much in literally the worst case scenario, it's foolish NOT to do research on them.
Genuinely they are fascinating. I do cosplay and I have gotten a lot ideas and pointers from furries.
They've solved so much in literally the worst case scenario, it's foolish NOT to do research on them.
All the ones I've met have always been super nice and all work in some form of IT.
See, I don't think water is the way to do it. I think you do it with a massive lead pole with teeth to lock into a gear.
Fully contained, no spillage
Oh, see I was thinking a portal on the ISS, but absolutely you could place one against the other, plop in a MASSIVE pole with teeth to match a gear, and just constantly generate power.
It's constantly evolving. New communities are getting constantly added, and new servers spun up for different reasons and ethos' are being spun up every day.
I for one cheer and root for my flip phone friends.
I'd never do it, but we have one at work and he's singlehandedly causing so much grief at work. Because none of the engineers wanna use a security app for login. They want a fob.
IT refuses to pay for fobs and wants us to use an app, but they also don't want to pay for a phone for anyone in engineering just to use the security app because it opens a floodgate of people with company phones.
It's just wonderful to watch this fight from the sidelines sipping tea.
You know, I have been thinking that my 3d printer has been more reliable than my 2d.
Every day I get closer and closer to just attaching a sharpie to the carriage.
In practice, you're probably right.
But in terms of "I wanna cut waste, and make the government lean! So I am gonna delete the space part of the government and replace it with my own!"
Just sounds bad, like really bad. Even worse than the armored Teslas. I can't imagine NASA is the top of people's lists of "utter wastes of time" It's not a regulator, it's not in the "known enemies" list unless you're a flat earther. I dunno how you spin it to be palatable.
... I mean that would've been the clearest conflict of interest you could've possibly summoned.
I mean, they had 14 years didn't they?
Have they ever tried to pass an ammendment for this?
Like seriously, if there was ever a time to do a concerted push for linux, it's now. Start the campaigns, start the tutorials start the memes and the warnings and get the process down to under an hour. It won't be a weird thing, it will be the lord and savior allowing your PC to continue even when windows says it can't.
This is why I'm of the opinion that we should refer to everyone in the legislative branch by state. Names should only be necessary for campaigning for the primary and the general. Sure, put their name in the title bar at the bottom of the screen as they speak, but the media should just refer to all politicians by their state of origin.
hear me out
We have almost 600 people in power in the legislative branch. 100 in the senate and 435 in the house. My home state has 10 Politicians in this branch, Georgia has 16, California has 54 . Most people struggle with 10 names at a party lasting 4 hours. Good luck trying to keep track of all of them on, unless you are a political science major, a purely casual basis. We will only be able to keep track of 3 to 5 politicians that just... truly suck. A few that we really like, and the rest... let's just be real here, do god knows what.
You can do a lot of damage being hidden and convoluted, and I don't think it's unfair to simplify it by grouping politicians by state. If a Georgia politician does not want to be grouped with Marjorie Taylor Greene then they need to provide ammunition to get them ousted in the next election cycle. If they don't then they're part of the problem. This also drags all of the state into things. If I don't like Tom Emmer, I sigh and move on about my day. If I find Minnesota did something dumb, then I get cranky. Oh wow, this is the guy in my district, or my neighbor's district? I had no idea. I want this guy out!
What's more, it incentivizes cooperation and competition at a state level, and begins to break up the more monolithic federal level of the parties. Federally, it's easier to pace the unpopular positions to be pushed by people with 4 years left in office, and hope the heat cools down three years later. If the entire state gets dragged into unpopular positions, it makes them much harder to push.