Wie lost kann man sein. Das Bahnnetz ächzt jetzt schon aus allen Löchern, während gleichzeitig die Nachfrage steigt. Wenn es dann mal ein Projekt gibt, wird es blockiert und stattdessen der Autobahnausbau gefordert. Prost Mahlzeit! Die Bahn kassiert die Häme, aber schuld ist unsere autozentrierte Politik.
dtxer
joined 2 years ago
I did and I'm not getting why you're so upset confused fish sounds
Thats why they lost the Emu war...
Yes, they ban moderators in the full knowledge in reducing the quality and well behavedness of users and to increase traffic by upset people. This is exactly what they want: upset people = engagement. This how Twitter works or maybe used to work, I didn't follow the recent changes too closely.
Ah yes, here we go, comparing changing the color in some pixel to someone risking his life and that of his family.
Small test: Dio porco Cunt Vaffanculo Hurensohn Dickhead
What a joke is this the US? For europeans these swear words are fine. u/spez ist ein HÜR3ns0hn
He seems like the average reddit user raises nose
I didn't go to university, because I wanted to learn useful stuff, but because I'm curiousity driven. There is so much cool stuff and it's very cool to learn it. That's the point of university that it prepares you for a scientific career where the ultimate goal is knowledge not profit maximisation (super idealistically).
Talking about Turing Machines it's such a fun concept. People use this to build computers out of everything - like really - it became a Sport by this point. When the last Zelda was Released the first question for many was, if they can build a computer inside it.
Does it serve a practical purpose? At the end of the day 99% of the time the answer will be no, we have computing machines built from transistors that are the fastest we know of, lets just use these.
But 1% of the time people recognize something useful... hey we now found out in principle one can build computers from quantum particles... we found an algorithm that could beat classical computers in a certain task... we found a way to actually do this in reality, but it's more proof of concept (15 = 5×3)... and so on
It's not dumb it's just a different take on reality (bayesian thinking). I have a model and accordingly a belief belonging to it: "given the data, how likely is it, that my current model is true?".
So maybe you're starting of believing an orbit has a spherical shape because it describes best your observations. But as you're collecting data you're noticing that an elliptic shape is more probable. Therefore you now believe the shape is elliptical.
In physics it's often different. People start of writing down a law from first principles and see if it agrees with the data. E.g. Kepler writing down his three laws of planetary motion in an act of epiphany. Then he sees this fits the data well and is happy.
The question is philosophical: Do you believe there is some fundamental laws nature obeys or do you say I just take the model which is the most probable given the data.
But I agree that only very few people are belonging to the latter group and even fewer people in theoretical physics, where people are obsessed with "beauty" - e.g. believing orbits are being described by ellipses, not just some shape my data suggests me.
Possible autocorrecr
I use Arsch btw