dragonflyteaparty

Way to misrepresent what they said completely. Please point to exactly where they said what you're claiming.

available income to support the child

So poor people don't get to have kids, huh? Which is easily and quickly turn into only rich people get to have kids. How would you enforce that? Involuntary sterilization? Involuntary abortions?

This is the exact same story that's been told for years about immigrants to justify racism. "These twelve kids list the same address as their house and the teacher drove by the address to find that no house existed. These kids are brown and must be illegal immigrants and are taking away from my children!"

So you think politicians should have the protected right to lie to the voters?

We could move if we wanted to. We aren't, at least right now, because we'd leave behind our entire social network. Even if we moved where we know people, they wouldn't help as much with our two young children. I know and understand and accept that. They don't have to help with our kids, but we'd lose the people who can. We'd lose our kids friends and the network we are building in the neighborhood, which of course can be rebuilt, but that's also a consideration. I'd probably only see my sister once a year if that because she can't leave the state due to a custody agreement. Funds would also be an issue.

I also worry about too many democratic people leaving and making the state more red as a result and leaving behind those who can't move, like my sister and her kids, who will suffer as a result of increasingly authoritarian laws. Some regressive politicians have outright said that it's their goal to make it miserable for democratic and liberal people to force them to move, make the state redder, and thereby gain even more power.

Nah, y'all is a small group. All y'all is a big group.

So did my then five year old. She had a period where she went through an entire hand soap dispenser every two days until we got her to quit. She still uses shampoo, but as far as we can tell, only (mostly?) when we give her permission. It doesn't run out super fast.

Honestly, to me, that would be incredibly fast prep or your meals are pretty simple. Even easy meals I've made a million times take me half an hour. Most take one hour to cook and I still feel like I'm rushing around.

1. Two approved colors, red and blue, are generally gang colors.

2. No, they're not. You generally can't buy then second hand. I've never seen uniforms at a resale store.

Except anything can be distracting and there's a certainly a reason why the school girl outfit has so many sexy versions and lingerie. School uniforms are a terrible idea for many reasons. You generally can't buy then second hand, low income families now need two sets of clothing for their kids, and it is possible to buy "higher quality" ones from places like Macy's.

I disagree completely. Uniforms have been proven to not help with anything they claim to. For one, they generally can't be bought second hand.

Really? Then why do they insist on an unconstitutional ability to hand down precedents that everyone has to follow as they see fit? It's not really one of the constitutional powers of the Supreme Court to make decisions in legal cases that define or refine our laws. That would mean everything like Dred Scott v Sanford wouldn't exist in how our laws function.