They literally say in the title "use prison for food and shelter as opposed to dying homeless in a gutter".
This states, in not unclear terms, that the context here is being disabled and so poor that food and shelter are inaccessible.
douglasg14b
joined 2 years ago
Outside of this, have you considered moving to a country with a viable welfare state that takes care of people with disabilities?
Ah yes, with all that money, paperwork, and jobs this person probably doesn't have...
Other countries don't want America's destitute.
Username checks out
Other than meds?
Actually getting enough sleep.
I'm not sure why you're so dismissive of this? It's kind of asinine.
Does everyone everywhere only ever use computers in an enclosed room? Is everyone with something value to exfiltrate easily accessible to kidnap and beat with a wrench?
This is valuable for corporate espionage, political purposes, or for nation states. If miniaturized, even easier for targeted attacks where it might be difficult to inject malware, or for broad attacks on office workers.
And the best part is that it doesn't leave a trace which beating someone with a wrench and malware would do....
Ohhh, you get to pay based on the meters of mouse movement you do. Usage based billing, perfect.
We already do, with intentionally fast breaking switches. They get away with charging $100 for a mouse, and ensuring a $0.30 part will break long before the devices useful lifetime. Generating mountains of ewaste.
Why can't they get away with the next step, which is charging a subscription fee to use their mice as well?
Which is planned obsolescence anyways.
It's not a dopey idea, it's an enshitification one, and one we will see again because there are no consequences.
Logitech will have subscription hardware, guaranteed. They'll just go back to the drawing board on how to market anti-consumer practices better.
And similarly are antitrust regulations have done nothing to prevent companies like Logitech from just acquiring all of their competitors and then doing this anyways once there is no more competition. And even using potential competitors into bankruptcy before they can actually compete.
The bullshit asymmetry principle is in full effect here.
It takes nothing to make up bullshit and it takes hundreds, thousands, of times the resources to refute it.
Meanwhile another hundred pieces of bullshit have been created.
This is all just a bunch of red herrings and we waste so much time and effort into giving them attention.
Did they though?
Many elderly end up being forced to sell their home and empty their retirements on nursing home costs. Leaving nothing to their descendants.
The ones that die at home or unexpectedly would be the ones that leave something behind in our capitalist wasteland.
This.... Isn't how large scale technologies work. Not even close, not even "same planet" close. That's also not how antitrust breakups work, why open source private technologies? How do you think that's supposed to work? How does that precedent work?
You could open source all ~15,000+ repos from my company, and be entirely incapable of actually operating the grand majority of it. And we're, maybe, 1/10,000th the size of Google on the tech side.
You also can't just "split" a single technology apart, that's gloriously, ignorantly, simplistic. You're talking potentially years of dedicated work by hundreds, thousands, of individuals to achieve something like that. How do you expect that to operate?
It's going to be a nightmare to just rip seemingly unrelated, but interdependent, verticals of Google apart. Your request here is wholely unrealistic.
Welcome to corporate conglomerates and enshitification.
Anti-consumer antitrust stances enables this to happen.