dlpkl

joined 2 years ago
[–] dlpkl 1 points 1 year ago

Sea of thieves: 22nd century

[–] dlpkl 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're not even into his McAfee arc yet.

[–] dlpkl 1 points 1 year ago

It's really funny how triggered you are. Believe it or not but French speakers aren't a minority in Quebec. Wild, I know!

[–] dlpkl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Crazy how you just imagined that entire situation just to make yourself angry lol

[–] dlpkl 1 points 1 year ago

Are you asking me if the right to enforce a dress code is in the Canadian constitution? Is this a joke or have you lost the plot?

[–] dlpkl 1 points 1 year ago

Please point out which rights you're being denied. I dare you. I promise you that there is not a SINGLE right that is infringed upon. A dress code is not protected in the Canadian constitution, however a religion that proscribes religious garb IS protected.

These people you are taking about were born in Canada, and expect to be protected by Canadian law. It's not fair to them that they are now being told to whip into line for a white protectionist government or get out when they were literally exercising their Canadian rights. You can go and argue the rhetoric with the individuals that took those jobs, I really don't care. But you cannot strip away the livelihood of an entire group of Canadians and then go, "Well, what did you expect?!" The rest of the world sees through that bullshit.

[–] dlpkl -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There's 7 million french and native French Canadians ffs. Random ass numbers lol. Nope it went where I wanted and the point still stands but it just flew over your head, like pretty much everything else in this thread.

Anglo Canadian culture is doing just fine despite our politicians not clutching their pearls and blaming immigrants.

You can't even keep track of what your narrative is supposed to be. If Quebec produces more original TV than the rest of Canada, then it's culture isn't disappearing, is it? Write these things down if you have to, you're starting to contradict yourself.

You're speaking English because it's an English sub lmfao. This is exactly the type of Quebecois entitlement that I'm talking about. You don't see me going to french subs and making a point of not forcing them to speak English.

[–] dlpkl -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So your argument is basically that since someone's rights aren't respected at a workplace, they shouldn't work there. Is this a mask off moment or are you starting to realize what the CAQ had intended with Bill 21 all along?

[–] dlpkl 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Absolutely not. When a person receives their Canadian citizenship they agree to uphold the values of the Canadian constitution and they are also afforded the rights that it lays out. Remind me, is the right to freedom of religion included in those documents?

[–] dlpkl 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So there's an imaginary line in the sand that you've drawn regarding how many jobs are allowed to be denied to minorities? Ever heard of the slippery slope argument?

I thank you for the kind reminder of the existence of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I wonder if the Quebec legislators have ever read it. Have you? Maybe your rights are only protected when you're off the clock eh?

[–] dlpkl 6 points 1 year ago

That's just a taste of how badly Quebec's nationalists try to create a rift. But they'll be the first to turn around and tell you that Anglos are the problem.

Cambridge dictionary definition of foreign: belonging or connected to a country that is not your own.

view more: ‹ prev next ›