Sure, and taking an in person interview or home assignment should be paid as well then to signal us that company is serious and it’s not a fake opening
My boss legit says that he will give me some time to work on it every 2-3 months and then drops a “customer requires X feature and I promised that we will deliver in one week”. And mind you we have to patch up to 3 major versions in the past to back port the new feature because client haven’t upgraded and won’t in near future… which means sometimes our major releases are 60-70% same as our minor patches for old versions. Semvering much?
In the universe with 20-30% of actual inflation development costs will always rise even for indie because devs have to eat something and live somewhere. Not to mention software licensing and equipment
Same guy who said that if something exists for free there’s no reason to charge for this
Then don’t use it or don’t complain
Spotify is cheap and that’s a fact. What’s the point of complain about single free music service?
Always love blaming the tool instead of the hands that use it
That’s a con and a pro of decentralized net: if you don’t like the owner, pick another instance or create your own and be the king. Bad news is, every instance is controlled by couple regular folks who’re not responsible financially so they can imply their own rules and post and ban whatever they want.
Like the jungle: you gotta learn to survive and avoid the monkeys with rabies.
As per their ceo, they want to provide access to education to all (which is good since educated people are less likely to believe propaganda) and they do not monetize the app in that country in any way, which means no taxes going to putins pocket.
People are quick to jump to conclusions but they’re right here.
view more: next ›
Even if they fire him, his code still exists and is still legally theirs.