decodehug647

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's also noteworthy that the RCS platform adopted by companies worldwide is run by Jibe, a company owned by Google. Doubtless, Apple doesn't want to use Google's servers any more than it needs to.

"open protocol" my ass. Google just wants control over everything.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It seems like all efforts to "bridge" imessage to anything outside apple software work this way - there's a Matrix bridge and a dedicated open source app and they both rely on the imessage client on a mac. Is there a legitimate reason for it not being reverse-engineered yet?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Sounds right, I'd kike to know why this has been downvoted so much.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No playlist? Wdym? There's a fork called PipePipe which has comment replies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It is community-run and works around ubuntu's questionable commercial moves (not including snap and maintaining their own debs for Firefox and Chromium) while developing their own software that I believe are generally more user-friendly than their equivalents in Ubuntu and other distros (the cinnamon desktop, the software manager and the updater, the welcome panel, system reports...)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
  1. better security as you have an up to date browser engine unlike the desktop app
 
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

except you probably delete more than system files which could be easily restored from an install disk

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are those buttons at the top?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

W. They've had this as an extension for some time, here's their blog post at the time of initial release, explaining how they did it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Of course there is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That looks like ubuntu not UwUntu

view more: next ›