dactylotheca

joined 1 week ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 25 minutes ago

What, you don't have a poop roller?

 
[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 1 hour ago

"It ain't honest work, but it's much"

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

If you want to protect your privacy against viewers of your videos, how you upload them to YouTube makes more or less no difference. With this scenario the question is how much information are you leaking in your content, and that'd cover everything from writing style idiosyncracies to anything that can be used to potentially identify eg. where you live and so on.

If you're worried about "malicious hackers", then the question is who are these potential hackers you're protecting against? Would they be attacking Google or you? If it's you, then how you upload things to YT is again completely meaningless. If they're attacking Google and get far enough to actually exfil data, what they'd actually be able to get out of it is anybody's guess. Using a VPN and a throwaway email is probably good enough in any case.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

Who are you protecting your privacy against here?

Because if it's Google, then why on earth would you want to upload content to YouTube in the first place?

OK, let's say you didn't give them your phone number and masked your voice. If you're not connecting over a VPN or something like Tor, they still have your IP address.

OK, you now use a VPN, but your browser can still be very effectively fingerprinted and that fingerprint could be nearly unique.

And so on and so on. And this isn't even going into metadata in & about your video files that could be used to fingerprint the system they were done on.

[โ€“] [email protected] 14 points 4 hours ago

โœจ banality of evil ๐Ÿ’ซ

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

You better not be gearing up to go all Deliverance on us with that story

[โ€“] [email protected] 192 points 7 hours ago (8 children)

Ah, good idea putting the fire in the tent, that way the fire will stay warm

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

From the Oxford English Dictionary:

[โ€“] [email protected] 56 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

The first time I saw a headline about this, just saying that the Supreme Court overturned "the Chevron doctrine" my initial thought was that I have no idea wtf they did but if the votes went 6-3 I know it can't be anything good.

Much to my consternation I appear to have been right.

[โ€“] [email protected] 39 points 23 hours ago (9 children)

I think that's just IT jobs in general. I noped out after 15 years, no fucking clue what I'll do but I can tell you it'll be anything but IT

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

What do you mean they cut the power? How could they cut the power, man? They're animals!

 
 
 
 
179
You know what? (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16877130

Shamelessly stolen from @[email protected]

157
me_irl (suppo.fi)
 
 
 

cross-posted from: https://suppo.fi/post/2748587

 
 
90
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

And yes that title is sarcasm, in case it's not immediately obvious.

view more: next โ€บ