cybervseas

Under New York law, such a [terrorism] charge can be brought when an alleged crime is “intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policies of a unit of government by intimidation or coercion and affect the conduct of a unit of government by murder, assassination or kidnapping.”

So even unlawful gathering to redress grievances with the government is considered terrorism? Or to do so against a private (civilian) organization? Good to know.

Were any of the kids a CEO? No? Meh…

Mainstream media is auditing the course. Big tech is already taking the intermediate level.

Lmao even.

Careful, that's a pre-existing condition, and might lead to denial of care.

The same reason media won't ask the obvious follow-up questions: "we CaN'T lOsE aCcESs!"

I can still hear it in my head. It's taking a lot of self control not to sing these lines out loud.

Riker as George opens up so many possibilities.

"I think it moved." for example 🙂

As the article says, since his comments were run through machine translation, it's possible they're meant more in jest rather than seriously. I'll keep a charitable perspective on this until we learn more.

With how built up the apps are these days, and how much data they collect and upload back to corp HQ, it's good to check and confirm the performance impact.

Kitty looks like a fancy hat the Duchess of Somethingbury would wear.

RFK Jr will be the one that gets you sick in the first place.

🐑🐑