cricket98

joined 1 year ago
[–] cricket98 -5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

if you give houses to homeless people indiscrimately, many of those houses will be uninhabitable in 2 years. What do you do then? Give them another house to wreck?

[–] cricket98 -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

not really, more like they exist to help prevent people from getting stabbed from a meth addicted homeless person who is convinced you are satan trying to steal their soul

[–] cricket98 -4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

If you were to start giving houses to the homeless, at least 50% of those houses would be uninhabitable within a year.

[–] cricket98 10 points 1 year ago (20 children)

since when are millionaires considered "lower middle class"

[–] cricket98 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would you tell people being persecuted for their religion that they aren't valid because they have a choice not to believe it?

[–] cricket98 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Religion is a protected class.

[–] cricket98 3 points 1 year ago

What a dumb take. There are plenty of businesses that advertise to the public but are not open to serving the public.

[–] cricket98 -3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Um that's not true at all. You are absolutely allowed to challenge the precedence of laws even if you have been yet to be directly affected.

[–] cricket98 3 points 1 year ago

That's totally fine. You shouldn't be forced to work with people you don't want to work with.

[–] cricket98 1 points 1 year ago

who is going to build them

[–] cricket98 -2 points 1 year ago

I said assuming no health risk. Sorry bud, I just think killing babies actually isn't a cool thing. I'm ok for doing it in desperate situations but killing a baby should not be a form of birth control.

view more: ‹ prev next ›