cricket98

joined 1 year ago
[–] cricket98 -1 points 1 year ago

What definition are you going by? Definition is: "a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority." none of that excludes those who are yet to be born.

[–] cricket98 -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

damn bro you got the whole squad laughing 😐

[–] cricket98 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What are you talking about? Did you respond to the wrong comment?

[–] cricket98 -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Of course. But in almost all instances the person being killed did something to deserve it. A child in the womb did nothing to deserve it.

[–] cricket98 -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Considering birth is a direct consequence of having sex, yes I would say a woman should be aware that they can get pregnant. You don't have to have sex, and you don't get to kill a baby because you were irresponsible.

[–] cricket98 -2 points 1 year ago

I don't think you should be able to murder someone because you predict they will live a hard life. We don't kill the mentally disabled for the same reason.

[–] cricket98 -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah lets defend against babies! Kill them! Rip them limb from limb!!

[–] cricket98 -2 points 1 year ago

Birth is the quintessential start of life.

This is an almost religious claim with no empirical evidence backing it.

But we both know you’re never going to accept that because you want to subjugate women and deny them happiness, and that’s all this is really about.

You have really been sold a narrative haven't you. I just think killing babies because you don't want them is bad. That's pretty much the extent of it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›