Most modern games set it between 70-90 and which is acceptable for most. in FPS game some people can have motion sickness with smaller FOV. Seeing as the FOV is adjustable in the .ini, it’s a user-accessibly setting. They just didn’t bother programming a UI element for it.
I totally appreciate how many mea culpas you have issued for that error. I read it the same way you did, at first.
I wonder how keeps up with his workout routine in the field.
When you do the math on pennies per hour, it's hard to argue that it's overpriced.
I'm viewing this game as more of a modder's platform. It's really the whole reason I play BGS games. As such, it works perfectly the way it is. It's decent out of the box, but once the CK comes out and the mods start rolling in, it's going to be perfect.
UI elements are usually designed to work on the lowest common denominator. Small screens, struggling cpus, etc. Modders don't care about any of that.
This is why I cut them slack. I'd rather have the clunky mechanics than lose the vibrant modding platform.
The game has some issues but, surprisingly, bugs really aren't one of them.
I'm using Vortex until MO2 officially supports the game. Works fine.
That is what I think he's trying to say. The game is polarizing because BSG didn't try to please everyone. Just like Souls, which is the best game ever to some and not interesting to others, Starfield is exactly right for a certain kind of player. By committing to a specific path, BSG made some people extremity happy at the cost of other people's disappointment.
I do, too, but it's out of duty and I'll stop when other people pick up the slack.
Haven't even gotten there yet. I'm not ever heading there, yet. Just had my first dogfight and I'm going wherever you go after that.
8PM start on a school night. Accidentally installed on the HDD, not the SSD. First 75 minutes were not auspicious.
Of course, he may not realize that this dries up one of the largest sources of the Unity developers the clients he does care about uses.