Yes I would, I mean. There's literally no evidence in that article. It's just detailing a situation, a horrific situation that needs to stop. But there's no evidence of genocide. Please again, provide evidence.
Yes, Israel has committed other war crimes and should be held responsible. But that's not the argument.
Prove it was intentional and not a misfire, a problem with civilians accessing up to date information etc etc. Gaza is very small and very densely populated. You have to prove without a shadow of a doubt intent here. It ain't gonna happen.
Again, you'd be better off taking Israel to court on war crimes you can actually prove. Ones that don't require proving this intent.
Prove it. Give any evidence, prove that you're smarter than basically every lawyer outside of the South Africa team and prove genocide.
If you think I'm a supporter of the Israeli government you didn't actually read my comments.
You people act like this conflict is between sports teams, fucking hell.
I believe the cutoff is in the 80's?
All of their tools are completely unrelated to what craftsman used to be.
Old craftsman or new? Because if new you might not be Craftsman very long. Old craftsman tools will outlive us all and if you can find them at a garage sale, buy em.
New craftsman tools are pretty much just junk.
Yes, owner surveys over tens of thousands of individuals regardless of breed meaning no implicit bias. The survey finds the same result across all breeds, the survey isn't specific to pits.
You really thought you did something there didn't you? Please learn to trust science over inflammatory media
Like if everyone claimed they had a perfect puppy, your critique would hold water, but flaws were reported across all breeds...
While I don't disagree with what you're saying. I don't fully agree with it either.
Because what I'm actually stating is. Don't charge a pedophile with murder, or don't charge a murderer with child molestation.
Words and charges matter.
Think about it like this, since there's no hard evidence that this is a genocide because of the legal definition. Israel is likely going to win this case. That means they can say they defended their actions in court and won, can't we all agree that's bad?
Charge them with what you can actually prove. They have committed war crimes, it's just not likely feasible to prove this is genocide without a lot more evidence.
Don't get me wrong, sure investigate it, make sure it isn't. But...