bustrpoindextr

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] bustrpoindextr 1 points 1 year ago

For me the browser, jerboa, liftoff and connect all won't login. But summit worked ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

[โ€“] bustrpoindextr 1 points 1 year ago

Like, 2 weeks ago.

[โ€“] bustrpoindextr 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This comment inspired me to shreddit right now

Edit: aaannnnndddddddd it's gone

[โ€“] bustrpoindextr 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I didn't have a list of every website that screwed up, but when one did I'd have to close the tab and reopen and it'd work, which sucks when you are actually navigating the Internet.

It wasn't that the stuff wouldn't load on Firefox it's that it would freeze and need to be dumped and retried. This happened very frequently.

Actual crashes were almost daily for me (with maybe 5 open tabs running on a Samsung flip 4, so pretty decent hardware)

Which sucks because I'd like Firefox to work on mobile, setting aside privacy and ads, the UI is much better in general. But it's bad at being a browser.

[โ€“] bustrpoindextr 1 points 1 year ago

First one you linked said Google patched Firefox performance by the time of the article, so that seems more like an oversight rather than asshole design.

Second one: rolling out redesigns is a complicated process. Most companies don't give everyone the new design at the same time, some roll out by geography, some by opt in, this was by browser type, which honestly makes the most sense.

Third one: an empty div is an easy accident to make, it's been removed. I also find it obscene to attribute an empty div to ruining battery performance. I wouldn't listen to that intern...

The worst of those three is number 2, but I can understand the decision from a web dev protective. Though I would've included all chromium based browsers in the rollout.

[โ€“] bustrpoindextr 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Some sites (notably Google ones) are notorious for implementing anti-competitive behavior, where if their website is visited other than a chromium based browser, it slows down or a functionality stops working.

I assume you're referring to Google meet (and the screen blur functionally), this is an open issue in Firefox for years, Google is using open standards to implement that, it's an issue in Firefox with how deadlocks work which is an extremely low level part of the browser. So it's not an easy solve.

There's a lot to complain about with Google, but this one isn't their fault. They use non-proprietary implementations and it's not their fault that Firefox will crash if they allowed Firefox users to use screen blur, the issue isn't a high priority for Mozilla.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ