You called out the wrong drink. The pdf you linked shows 181g of sugar in the drink from the image. So technically the image is wrong, because it said 183, but... not really wrong.
bustrpoindextr
joined 1 year ago
The business owner took advantage of social expectations, sure...and yeah it isn't ethical at all... but they have the least involvement in this whole thing compared to the server and customer.
Mental gymnastics. They literally set the wage requiring the "whole thing" between the server and customer
Doubt. Unless you were working at a high end place or a really high traffic place.
Best I ever hit was 12/hour, which sure. Over minimum, but not over what minimum should've been at the time. And for the most part it was like 9/hour. Still over minimum but previous point still stands.
Current minimum wage should be slightly under what you're claiming you made, based on inflation and such. So to fix the tipping problem is a two point issue, raising minimum wage to reflect an appropriate wage based on inflation since inception, and then removing the minimum wage nonsense for tipped employees.
You people that keep claiming they'll make less with this change is what helps keep this nonsense in pepertuity. It makes the employees think that the employers are the ones that are actually helping them by giving this deal. And painting the customers as the enemy.
The real enemy is corporate. Worker wages haven't raised since Reagan, but upper management wages have gone through the roof. Because they just pay a modest amount to Congress to keep worker wages stagnant so they can reap huge profits, and then they perpetuate class nonsense like your spewing to keep the target off of their back and onto your neighbors.
The other user is making the claim that since starlink is a private company, Russia can't make the claim of them being American satellites.
It's a flawed assertion but whatever
A negative number is still a number
I have a 2000 and a 2014. I don't expect to replace either until both of them die. Even then... I also have a motorcycle. I really don't want to buy any of the nonsense coming out these days.
Lmao, you can bypass a Tesla to get all the subscription stuff, so I'm sure someone's figured out this nonsense too
Your first statement is all well and good but your second statement is flat out wrong. That can only happen given a static population. But humans reproduce pretty rapidly. There will always be new customers until we hit a carrying capacity limit, but as technology improves the earths carrying capacity keeps going up, until of course we decimate resources and then it'll come crashing down.
If it's not housing, it's a golf course, or business district or something. The old "if you build it, they will come" plenty of people also don't spend their lives in the same place so moving to a newer, better facility is enticing to those that can afford it.
Ah yes, because that's how capitalism works. People would definitely stop developing the rest of the island because they don't need more housing.
Yes, that doesn't happen in cities at all.
HOAs have excessive rights especially newer ones and this is probably actually legal. The city likely owns none of it btw.
HOAs are a blight on American home ownership, John Oliver did a segment on it, but new HOA contracts are crazy if you haven't had a peek at one.
Right... so it's not actually separate...