bouh

joined 2 years ago
[–] bouh 1 points 2 months ago

Because that post is a hunt for tankies. Which is a sport done by liberals who usually support Israel in its massacre.

[–] bouh 1 points 2 months ago

Les enfants de moins de 5 ans probablement ?

[–] bouh 3 points 2 months ago

The thing is that in a polarised world you support one side or the other, and the sides are the US and China. US is certainly not better deserving support than China, but liberals will call tankie anyone who support China in any way, shape or form. For a liberal it's completely inacceptable to say that China is doing anything better than the US.

[–] bouh 1 points 2 months ago

That's in theory. In practice it's only used by liberals to insult leftist when they criticise the US or liberalism.

[–] bouh 6 points 2 months ago

Exactly this! I've never seen the term used by anyone but liberals to taunt, attack or divert a debate.

[–] bouh 0 points 2 months ago

It's funny how France created all its neighbours! Britain, Russia, Italy, Spain! And proceeded to go into mortal wars with most of them!

[–] bouh 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is no chance it wasn't meant to be an open world. The witcher 3 was a very successful open world they made.

Also, CP77 actually is in the style of elden ring that was praised for it, but CP77 came long before it. Most critiques of CP77 missed that part because the game doesn't throw it at your face.

[–] bouh 5 points 2 months ago

Fukushima, in 2024,is a city of 272569 inhabitants. If that's unlivable, I'm fine with it. Hiroshima, Nagazaki and Chernobyl are all inhabited too.

Saying that nuclear stuff makes places unlivable is plain wrong, it's anti-science. It's comics level of bullshit science. Travel in time is a more serious theory than nuclear stuff destroying the planet.

[–] bouh 3 points 2 months ago

Chernobyl yes, let's talk about it : after the catastrophy, 2 reactors were used until very recently (like until 10 or 20 years ago).

After the catastrophy, Chernobyl was made into an exclusion zone where people wouldn't be allowed to live. But people came back 10 years after and it's a small village now.

BTW even Hiroshima and Nagazaki that were annihilated with atomic bombs, that is weapons meant to destroy whole cities, were quickly inhabited again.

So much for the permanent destruction and millions of years of contamination. CO2 is a far more deadly compound for mankind than any radioactive material. Anti-nuke militants are merely ignorant fanatics.

[–] bouh 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

And that cannot happen. It's a fear people have because they equate a nuclear power plant with a nuclear bomb. That is as wrong as considering the earth flat.

[–] bouh -1 points 2 months ago (13 children)

A nuclear power plant cannot destroy a city.

view more: ‹ prev next ›