boramalper

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] boramalper 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I fully agree with you and I’m not saying this in their defence but Element is not owned by Matrix either right? It’s owned by another (for-profit?) party and in fact Matrix (Foundation) doesn’t maintain any clients whatsoever.

I guess it has something to do with “client neutrality” and the protocol not being defined by / tied to a “reference implementation” which I can get behind, but it’s hurting users in the end as you said.

Hopefully things should get a whole lot more stable with Matrix 2.0 and which may incentivise people to put in more effort into writing better and more polished clients.

 

Since the outset of Matrix, our aim has always been to provide a protocol that lets you build open, decentralised, secure communication apps which outperform the mainstream centralised alternatives. It’s been a twisty journey - first focusing on making Matrix work at all (back in 2014), and then getting it out of beta with Matrix 1.0 in 2019, and now focusing on making Matrix fast, usable and mainstream-ready with Matrix 2.0.

[–] boramalper 2 points 1 month ago

I see, thank you!

[–] boramalper 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are there any iOS apps?

[–] boramalper 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Neat! Is this like Hacker News but federated?

[–] boramalper 2 points 1 month ago
[–] boramalper 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting, not sure why. Try the following:

[email protected]

relative link

absolute link

[–] boramalper 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think you’re referring to ForgeFed.

I don’t have a straight answer but the work is still in progress just fine, as far as I can tell. Here are some pointers if you want to dig deeper:

[–] boramalper 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel very similar with regard to blockchains, however I didn’t want to throw the baby out with the bathwater. I think (or rather hope) that there are some cryptocurrencies/blockchains that are actually useful/interesting to discuss. Certainly agreeing with you though.

[–] boramalper 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why not, go for it! Just be careful about copyright infringement as it's against lemmy.world ToS.

[–] boramalper 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Consider it at least federated? :)

I've an account on dbzer0 too and often lurk there as well, however I wasn't sure about its longevity given the amount of piracy-related activity going on there.

69
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by boramalper to c/newcommunities
 

[email protected]

(relative link | absolute link)

What

All things and everything about decentralization: news, announcements, proposals, and discussions about decentralized apps, protocols and communities.

  • decentralized web (dweb)
  • peer-to-peer (P2P)
  • file-sharing (e.g., BitTorrent, IPFS, and Gnutella)
  • self-hosting
  • federation (e.g., ActivityPub/Fediverse and Bluesky)
  • federated apps (e.g., Mastodon, Lemmy, and Pixelfed)
  • cryptocurrencies (e.g., Bitcoin and Ethereum)

Why

I've noticed that although a lot of people are interested in decentralization, there aren't many forums where people can share news and discuss and develop projects together. Reddit used to have /r/Rad_Decentralization, /r/DarknetPlan and so on but the 2023 Reddit API controversy was the the final nail in their coffin.

 

New features coming to the future of self-hosting internet archives: a full plugin ecosystem, P2P sharing between instances, Cloudflare/CAPTCHA solving, auto-logins, and more….

[–] boramalper 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Syncthing?

There is also Borg but I think it doesn’t have the features you’re looking for such as incremental backups and two-way sync etc.

[–] boramalper 28 points 1 month ago (6 children)

What’s wrong with GitLab?

6
PeerTube v6.3 released! (joinpeertube.org)
submitted 2 months ago by boramalper to c/decentralization
4
DebTorrent (2013) (wiki.debian.org)
submitted 2 months ago by boramalper to c/decentralization
 

This page is intended to collect information, ideas and comments related to adding BitTorrent functionality to the downloading of package files by Apt.

view more: next ›