blackstrat

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

No idea about socials, but some will do a DBS check

[–] [email protected] 218 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Eastern Ukraine isn't an ideal tourist spot at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I don't understand it either. On one hand people say don't remember addresses, use DNS and on the other DNS relies on static addresses but then every device is "supposed" to have random addresses via SLAAC or privacy addresses. It just doesn't seem to tie together very well, but if you use them like IPv4 addresses you're apparently doing it wrong.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

A what are they putting in the BWT water that's corroding their brains?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

You have very different kids to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

What about it is fiddly?

The insane addresses. The reliance on DNS, the unpredictability of addresses, that each device can have so many addresses and you need to know what each does and is used for and how that impacts inter-network routing and firewall rules. Privacy IPs, what the hell? Its a solution to something that's fixed by tried and understood IPv4 NAT.

If you just want a flat simple network where everything on your lan is equal, everything has a globally unique and trackable IP I'm sure it's fine. But if you have something more sophisticated it becomes much more complicated. And I genuinely can't see how IPv6 advocates can't see the problems it introduces.

What we need is a larger address space and fast adoption, that's it. If after 30 years of awful adoption rates and only when people have a gun to their head they begrudgingly might adopt it, then you have a bad protocol.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But at that point there's no difference other than it's less familiar and more fiddly with v6. Why even bother.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Here's my story of trying to use IPV6 for the past 3 days, and I know I'm not a typical user.

I use Opnsense as a router firewall. Using IPv4, 5/6 VLANs, almost all devices statically addressed with alias's configured for each. This lets me have firewall rules like "block youtube on the kids devices", or "use a different DNS server for the wife", only allow the fire stick to access the internet after 7am. That sort of thing.

First problem is working out how to even get IPv6 on the WAN and what it even means that my ISP has given me a /48 and a /64. Loads of reading and some cobbling together later I have it. But no clients are getting addresses. Eventually fix that and now they have an address. But I don't want to use SLAAC as that's a nightmware to keep track of, DHCPv6 doesn't work for android devices so they'll be on IPv4 anyway. I don't want each client to have a globally unique address as that just allows insane tracking. I don't know if my IPv6 address will ever change, but it seems likley it will and that would be a nightmare to fix. I manage to get private fd00/8 addresses allocated to clients, but I don't know how to configure IPv6 NAT so devices have an IPv6 IP, but can't access through the WAN using it. And by that point I just don't see the point any more. I'd just be duplicating all my rules that would be far too time consuming, confusing and I don't see the point.

I want local private IP addresses. I don't want clients to have unique IPs. I want the addresses to be known and static. I want my firewall rules to be tied to specific addresses for 90%+ of devices.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

RAID IS NOT BACKUP RAID IS NOT BACKUP RAID IS NOT BACKUP

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't use Red drives for a NAS!! You need the Red Plus (or is it red pro) disks as they're CMR.

I'd go for Ultrastar drives personally. There's a few really good videos online analyzing the backblaze stats for different drives that are well worth watching.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Everywhere? Where will we put all the existing things? You can't turn the whole world in to just toilets, that's taking the piss!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Or save yourself a character and just yay

36
New Player Strat (i.imgur.com)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/guitars
 

A Player strat in black with maple neck. So far I'm pretty impressed. The neck is nice, the back is satin and the fretboard is glossy, but not sticky like I thought it might be. The electrics all seem high quality. Fit and finish all excellent and almost as good as my PRS SE. Came setup with the bridge very floating and the 9 gauge strings old and corroded, but whatever they were coming straight off either way.

I've already modded it to end up with the guitar I really wanted.

New single ply black pickguard, decked the trem, tightened the truss rod, and a new set of GHS Gilmour strings.

Now I'm very happy. I just love looking at it as much as playing it.

55
Over 9000! (lemmy.fwgx.uk)
 
 

Thought I'd share what I think is one of the most beautiful guitars I've seen: my PRS SE Custom 24 in bright Bonnie Pink. The light was catching it quite nice this evening.

This thing plays as good as it looks. The neck is really nice, the frets and edge of fretboard are like butter, the trem is really nice with a push in bar. The high fret access is just superb. I love the pickups that have some great bite, but clean up with volume and tone adjustment. The split coil setting, although not perfect adds a lot of versatility so I dont often want to swap guitars just for some single coils - well, most of the time.

Only criticisms would be I think it should have some with locking tuners, but as a £90 add on I can see why they did it to keep the cost down - having since added them I really like the PRS locking system.

The pickup selector switch I find to be quite out of the way and the trem bar gets in the way if wanting to switch mid song. A LP is hard to beat in this regard.

Overall a definite 9.8/10, very highly recommended.

 

I hope you are all enjoying yourself and easing in to the weekend. And if you're working, I'll save a cold one for you

 

This was a very nerve racking experience as I'd never gone through a major version Proxmox update before and I had spent a lot of time getting everything just so with lots of config around disk and VLANs. The instructions were also a big long page, which never fills me with confidence as it normally means there's a lot of holes to fall in to.

My initial issue was that it says to perform the upgrade with no VM's running, but it requires an internet connection and my router is Opnsense in a VM. Thankfully apt dist-upgrade --download-only, shutdown the Opnsense VM and then apt dist-upgrade did the trick.

A few config files changed and I always hate this part of Debian upgrades, but nothing major or of importance was impacted.

A nervous reboot and everything was back up running the new Proxmox with the new kernel. Surprisingly smooth overall and the most time consuming part by far was backing up my VM's just in case. The upgrade itself including reboot was probably 15 mins, the backups and making sure I was prepared and mentally ready was about an hour.

Compared to upgrading ESXi on old hardware like I was doing last year, it was a breeze.

Highly recommended, would upgrade again.

 

I set up friendica as my first foray on to the fediverse. It worked well, but as it turns out doesn't work that well with Lemmy, which was my main usecase. Well whilst trying to fix DNS issues setting up a Lemmy instance instead, I noticed my DNS logs were rather full. My Unbound DNS was getting 40k requests every 10 mins to *.activitypub-troll.cf. I don't know who or what that is, but blocking it didn't reduce the activity. At first I thought it was something to do with Lemmy as I'd forgotten I still had Friendica running. Thankfully stopping the Friendica service reduced the DNS request back to normal.

So if you've set something up recently, you might want to check if there have been any consequences in your service logs

 

It's been a long time in the making, but this is the happiest I've been with my board for a while.

Signal chain: TU2 -> Blues Driver -> Vox Valvetone -> Diezl VH4-2 -> Wampler Pinnacle Deluxe v1 -> Wampler Pantheon -> EHX Rams Head Big Muff -> Mooer E-Lady -> Front of amp

FX Send -> TC Electronic Flashback 2 -> EHX Oceans 11 -> FX Return.

Running it all in to a Peavey Classic 20 Mini Head and a Harley Benton 1x12 cab with Vintage 30 speakers. The little red pedal is plugged in to the amp to toggle the channels (clean / OD) and the boost (on / off).

Considering it's by far and away the biggest pedal on the board, the VH4-2 probably gets the least amount of use. But what it does is so unique that I'm not getting rid of it.

The Oceans 11 is my most used pedal as it's never off. Otherwise I use the Pinnacle the most. It has such a good tone that reacts to the volume knob on the guitar so well. I find I can do almost any OD / distortion sound I want from it.

The Pantheon, BD2, Valvetone and Rams Head all do their particular thing that the amp and Pinnacle can't. So even though there's a lot of drive pedals here I don't feel like there's much overlap at all. It means I can play Gilmour one minute, then Tool the next, Van Halen another and Clapton another.

Stuff no longer on the board: TC Electronic mojomojo (too similar to other things), Boss DS-2 (not my kind of sound these days), Behringer noise gate (turned out my noise issues were caused by a Boss RC1), Behringer CS400 compressor (I want to like it and maybe I'll put it back on but I haven't been able to get what I want out of it).

view more: ‹ prev next ›