bhamlin

joined 1 year ago
[–] bhamlin 5 points 2 months ago

But 0x80 is how you'd normally express 128 as hex. So it's relevant. But deliberately confusing.

[–] bhamlin 2 points 2 months ago

And hopefully you never will

[–] bhamlin 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It was IBM's binary to character transform. DB2 can still use it if you configure it to do so. Or was at least as of the version from 1998 that I had to replace.

[–] bhamlin 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Lemmy's own Poem for your Sprog.

[–] bhamlin 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I would have pegged EBCDIC for that, but ok

[–] bhamlin 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I sincerely hope that if they come up with a 128bit instruction set they call it "x80" to maintain backwards compatibility with previous set names and be deliberately confusing to everyone.

[–] bhamlin 2 points 2 months ago
[–] bhamlin 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is that why bengay tastes like balls?

[–] bhamlin 3 points 2 months ago

I dunno, wlxaa392a001f7d has a nice ring to it

[–] bhamlin 63 points 2 months ago

I would subscribe to Cthulhu's OnlyFhtagns.

[–] bhamlin 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Updoot for moon reader

[–] bhamlin 2 points 2 months ago

I punched all the holes, is this right?

view more: ‹ prev next ›