And hopefully you never will
bhamlin
joined 1 year ago
It was IBM's binary to character transform. DB2 can still use it if you configure it to do so. Or was at least as of the version from 1998 that I had to replace.
Lemmy's own Poem for your Sprog.
I would have pegged EBCDIC for that, but ok
I sincerely hope that if they come up with a 128bit instruction set they call it "x80" to maintain backwards compatibility with previous set names and be deliberately confusing to everyone.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Is that why bengay tastes like balls?
I dunno, wlxaa392a001f7d
has a nice ring to it
I would subscribe to Cthulhu's OnlyFhtagns.
Updoot for moon reader
I punched all the holes, is this right?
But
0x80
is how you'd normally express 128 as hex. So it's relevant. But deliberately confusing.