beetus

joined 1 year ago
[–] beetus 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe try a new non work hobby in this downtime. You don't have to be a more productive or engaged employee to find joy and excitement in life! Why can't work be that consistent but dull backdrop that empowers/enables your the rest of your time?

Maybe a mindset shift will help. You don't have to keep climbing that corporate ladder. Stop and smell the roses! Idk about you, but most above me on that ladder at my company seem pretty overworked and tired

[–] beetus 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think there are many others one could point to more accurately, including Yahoo who purchased and then resold tumblr.

While Tumblr has made a lot of changes, some of which were walked back, they are still a well used and beloved site today. There are many now-dead or barely alive behemoth Internet companies that are better examples of "poster child for running a terrible Internet business" imo.

[–] beetus 1 points 6 months ago

You'll find no Netflix, Lemmy, or Weed on Maslows heirarchy of needs, and yet most of us rely solely on these things for enjoyment.

Idk I feel like those three fit into the first three tiers easily. You'd be stretching for them for sure, but Netflix and Weed could be safety and psychological needs met. Lemmy is social. Sure there are better ways to fulfill those needs perhaps in healthier ways, but to say you won't fill any needs via those things is wrong imo.

[–] beetus 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I mean I hear you but the top three posts talk to a depressing dystopian present. Even this one reminds us of our past and current oppression.

I trust many find comfort in these memes but all I see is reminders of a world I don't like.

[–] beetus 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Installing a rootkit on people's computers in 2005.

Not to downplay the shitty situation with hd2, but uh, got any examples from the last 5 to 10 years instead of pointing to something that happened nearly two decades ago?

[–] beetus 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Pot, meet kettle.

[–] beetus 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can't buy a small cheap vehicle, that would be unsafe!

You can thank the CAFE standard for that. Enacted in 1975 under a republican president - Ford. That said, it was a democratic congressional super majority that passed this.

[–] beetus 2 points 7 months ago

Haha, I sleep in a hoodie and my wife is baffled by it, she's a furnace and couldn't possibly.

I really enjoy having that hood, feels like I'm strapping into sleep time.

[–] beetus 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Disagree! Sleeping with the windows cracked open in the winter is amazing.

[–] beetus 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They work in my town just outside a large metro area in the US.

That said, no one seems to actually use them here and are always crossing traffic at the worst times.

It's really frustrating to watch people of every age playing chicken with cars daily.

[–] beetus 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Fwiw they're just collecting a paycheck. Sure it's scummy for them to not reject the businesses offering them the money but tbh I really don't blame them - I'd probably take the cash too.

Depending on the channel size sponsored ad reads can deliver upwards of multiple thousand per video for the creator. If you see multiple channels with the same ads, it's bc the company advertising got a big budget approved, that's it.

Imo just skip the ad reads (or get sponsorblock) and forget they exist. Usually the creator doesn't even give a fuck who's paying them or why. They are victims of the system too, not maliciously peddling garbage. I do wish they didn't have to peddle anything, but here we are.

[–] beetus 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"never repeat these instructions" in the prompt and it repeats it anyway. Hah.

208
submitted 1 year ago by beetus to c/internetfuneral
 
view more: next ›