Republicans blocked it. There's no "both sides" to this.
baru
joined 2 years ago
That wasn't said. Pretending a crazy summary was said is a common fallacy.
There's a person for the democrats, there's one for the republicans. Due to the voting system only two parties matter. Why invite someone else? Doesn't make sense. Don't get why you make that as blocking.
Trump cultists are willing to do anything for that man.
They don't do that on their own though. Trump actively directs people to use violence.
Other easy option: just be rich.
Like promises not to do mass layoffs.
And what if that promise is broken? It shouldn't just have promises, there should be clear consequences attached as well. Else it'll just be a broken contract or promise. That can end up in legal stuff for ages.
Kennedy is stealing votes from Biden
Kennedy is right wing crazy person.
Ah, there's the both sides argument.
Prices usually go down as production increases, no? And it's not really about increased production, more about gaining experience in producing it.
Google: Norway EVs.
Why would they need to turn anything off? That's not how they expand capacity in the Netherlands. Why would it be needed?
The mass production takes time to build up. It takes time to get experience. I've read various articles around SMRs. For at least the first 9 there will not be any mass production. It'll be very costly.
Usually production improves as more is produced. Possibly it improves by the experience gained, possibly by a new factory.
It'll not be immediately cheap and mass produced. While that is often claimed for SMRs.
As small ones aren't as efficient, it'll be more costly per kWh. That it'll be cheaper than regular nuclear power seems mostly wishful thinking.