At least there's only a single way to tell the computer "ok, execute this command". And you see the command written in plain text before you.
And, no, no useful interface is intuitive because computers just have too many functions. There's no intuitive appliance in the world with more than a temperature knob and a timer knob. Knowledge is always required, be that cultural or by RTFM.
Wenn du Cola willst dann nimm gefälligst Rotwein.
Bis zu 12 Wochen nach Empfängnis / 14 nach letzter Blutung nach Beratungsgespräch und drei Tage Bedenkzeit nicht strafbar. "Nicht strafbar" ist halt nicht das gleiche wie "legal" und darum geht's bei dem ganzen.
Medizinisch notwendige Abtreibung oder nach Vergewaltigung ist auch ohne das Gespräch legal denn das Recht auf Selbstverteidigung gilt auch gegenüber dritten.
Meiner Meinung nach ist das erstmal die komplett falsche Baustelle und hat auch sehr gute Chancen vom BVerfG gleich wieder gekippt zu werden denn die haben sich bei ihrem letzten Urteil schon was gedacht. Viel wichtiger wäre es mal wirklich sicher zu stellen dass genügend Beratungsstellen da sind, dass es genügend Ärzte gibt die das ganze durchführen können. Gerade im Süden sieht's da eher mau aus. Bei der Regelung der Beratung selbst kann man auch gerne mal nachstraffen.
Iran didn't turn tribal and is still diverse AF. Don't confuse the people and overall culture with the backwards government which isn't exactly popular.
Das steht im ersten Kommentar verlinkten Artikel aber anders:
Die Schwangerschaft beginnt nach dem Gesetz mit der Einnistung der befruchteten Eizelle in der Gebärmutter, nicht etwa mit der Befruchtung selbst.
Ein Mensch kann schon existieren aber noch keine Mutter mit ihm schwanger sein. "Menschenwürde ab Befruchtung" ist kein Ding dass du in der Schwangerschaftsentscheidung finden wirst das steht irgendwo bei Präimplantationsdiagnostik. Da gehts darum dass es gegen die Menschenwürde verstößt wenn man aufgrund von willkürlicher Kriterien nicht an der "welche Zelle wird eingepflanzt"-Lotterie teilnehmen darf.
Beginn der Schwangerschaft ist die Nidation (wenn sich die befruchtete Eizelle einnistet) und ab da gilt das Recht auf Leben, das ist C I im BVerfGE 39, 1.
Du könntest jetzt sagen "Das Recht auf Leben beginnt erst später", das wäre mit "Menschenwürde ab Befruchtung" zumindest logisch kompatibel, "Vor der X. Woche Schwangerschaft ist das gar kein Mensch" würde damit aber brechen.
Iran only really fits half into the latter category because the people are vastly more liberal than their government.
And if you look at polls (can't find them right now sorry) Iran is actually one of the least Muslim Muslim countries around when you drill down into dogma, e.g. belief in heaven, belief in angels, such things. The average Iranian is about as Muslim in their private faith as someone believing in reincarnation is Christian.
ab wann es Leben ist, oder menschliches Leben ist
Das hat das BVerfG schon entschieden: Ab der Befruchtung haben wir einen individuellen Menschen, ab der Nidierung, der Punkt an dem die Natur selbst entscheidet ein bestimmtes Leben zur Frucht zu bringen, gibt's das Recht auf Leben. Eine befruchtete Eizelle entwickelt sich nicht zum, sondern als Mensch.
Wenn du an der Linie rumdoktorst dann fallen auch die ganzen Urteile von wegen Präimplantationsdiagnostik weg. Dann können Eltern Eizellen nach Augenfarbe aussuchen weil die Menschenwürde so früh noch nicht greift.
and questionable things regarding immigration laws
I mean... there have been some regrettable cases in Germany directly after the law declaring foreign sub-18 marriage to be invalid, like 16/18yold asylum seeker couples getting separated. There's a difference between saying "we don't recognise that, you'll have to marry again under German law" and "we're putting you in two different accommodations in two different states because you can't possibly be a family unit and that's how the dice fell". You can't just blindly assume they're not heads over heels for each other, no matter how arranged and young the marriage was, you have to look at the individual case and if everything checks out treat them eg. analogous to siblings when it comes to accommodation.
The phase-out practically already started in the early 90s, latest when it became abundantly clear that building more reactors was not politically feasible.
The reason is distrust in anything being handled properly. See Asse (they just discovered irradiated water that they don't have any idea how it came to be because it's actually above the deposit), see plants running without functioning backup generators for decades, the list is endless.
IIRC according to the original plan the last coal plants would've shut down before the last nuclear plants. Certainly would've been possible without 16 years of CDU government.
How much of that is due to French nuclear reactors shutting down, both during summer (to not turn the rivers that cool them into fish soup) as well as all that maintenance stuff they had going on lately.
Germany is an electricity exporter.
Also: You're looking at generated power. Not coal consumption. That doesn't completely erase the bump but it's quite a bit smaller, they shut down some very old plants and replaced them with more efficient ones.
The current biggest chunk is oil, mostly used in transportation, and gas, for heating. Those will need to be electrified and replaced with what 25% of their Joule-value in electricity production, gas will stay longest because it's used for peaker plants and, once the grid is completely renewable, that will be done with synthesised gas.
Had the original plan to phase out nuclear and coal been followed we'd already be there but the CDU insisted on knee-capping renewables because the likes of RWE were asleep at the wheel and hadn't shifted their investments fast enough, electricity production in Germany suddenly wasn't an oligopoly, any more, can't have that.
The step from single to multicellular life forms is a metasystem transition, and those don't roll back, and are amplified by branching growth at the penultimate level^1^.
Or, more concretely: A strain of cells learns to communicate with each other, to coordinate, giving all a fitness advantage in other words they create a control system to regulate the lot of them and apes together stronger than apes apart. The emergence of that (usually distributed) control system is a metasystem transition. Because that kind of cooperation has advantage over not cooperating like that, evolution never goes into the other direction (in that sense it has a direction, similar to how time doesn't really exist in physical microstates, only in their relationship to macrostates: It's not like genes can't drift in the other direction, it's that if they do they get culled at a much higher rate).
And because our critters now have an advantage, they have more resources to develop, to multiply both in absolute number, as well as to specialise into different functions. That's the branching growth at the penultimate (that is, below the control system) level, and it makes them even more fit. Branching growth is one of those cybernetic laws that happen again and again and again and again and you'd think "surely this can't always be the case" and yes you'll find exceptions but by and large, yes, once there's a metasystem transition you get that effect, again, because it's very regularly beneficial to the whole.
If that got you consider the evolutionary step from soup of chemicals over the first feedback systems made out of simple molecules creating environments benefitting their own replication to actual cells. Which is explainable by chance alone, but once you take metasystem transitions into account suddenly it doesn't take an eternity, any more, only aeons.
^1^ I should, possibly, at this point warn about Principia Cybernetica just as people warn about tvtropes. It's a rabbit hole.