auntbutters

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sadly, there's just not a critical mass of users in most of the communities I'm interested in. I pop in here every once in a while to see what's going on, but it's currently lacking the diversity of content that you get on Reddit. I'm still rooting for it to succeed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I have a feeling this was "inspired" by that original video. Uses the same $100,000 increments + the example of how little you would notice buying a Lamborghini

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Interesting article. I understand the concept there, but I still don't see how defederation solves anything.

Threads is free to develop proprietary features in their app, whether they participate in the fediverse or not.

Defederation just prevents the two platforms from communicating. In my view, this hurts Lemmy's growth far more than it could ever hurt a massive app like Threads. They are way too big to notice or care.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. Keeping our platform as open as possible helps us to grow as a community.

If you hate Meta and love Lemmy, the best thing to do is to federate with them. We stand to benefit far more from their massive user base they are from our tiny one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I honestly don't understand the benefit of defederating. The argument seems to boil down to "Meta bad".

The thing is, we're not doing much to hurt Meta by defederating -- they're far too big to care. On the other hand, by silo-ing ourselves off as a tiny community, we're actually just preventing our own potential growth.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How does Meta do a "takeover of the fediverse"? The whole design of the fediverse prevents it from being controlled by any single entity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, just like big companies like Google use email protocols with Gmail. It's actually good for adoption. The alternative is that FB uses its own proprietary and competing protocol, making everything more fragmented.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the term "science debate" is almost an oxymoron. The scientific method is all about designing experiments that minimize bias to get at objective truths about the world. The end results are not opinions to be presented on a debate stage.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I understand your point that F has more whole numbers in the "habitable range". I'm just skeptical about the importance of that fact. We don't usually need precise temperatures in everyday life, so we tend to talk in whole numbers. But I don't think people have any trouble using decimal places in applications where the extra precision is needed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every measurement unit needs to go into decimal places where precision matters. If you are recording a temperature in Celcius to 5 decimal places, that temperature in Farenheit will also have 5 decimal places. You just happened to pick an edge case where all those decimal places in F are 0. You could have instead picked, for e.g. 26.52348C = 79.742264F.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's probably just a matter of what you're used to. Celcius feels just as natural to us Canadians as (I'm sure) Farenheit is to Americans. We talk in round numbers too, they're just a bit different than yours. 0C is a (literally) freezing cold winter, 30C is a hot summer day.

view more: next ›