asmoranomar

Yes. They are bigger. It sends a message to the entire predatory ecosystem. Which would not happen if they went for a smaller Gacha game.

Other than that, no, let's give them fines too.

I don't live in NY but as I understand it, they had to offer this service to every qualified individual. They most likely didn't have the option to only support certain or just existing customers.

Think of it this way: Had ATT the option to exclude, they would have and abuse it as much as possible. They can't, so either they follow the law or take their business elsewhere. Leaving paves the path for another company or cooperative who does want to follow the new laws, rather than having ATT undermine at every opportunity. It hurts in the short term, but in the long term it helps. NY isn't the first place to chase big telcomm out.

Yeah, no kidding. I would never be satisfied with infinite money, I'd need more!

I've also been involved in something similar. It costs a lot to expand infrastructure. Part of my job would be to plan and explain the costs associated with that. Wireless still needs a wired connection, and wireless still has connection limitations. You can't just add more users and expect things to work. And you can't just plop another receiver without it interfering with the others. It needs to be properly planned and something as simple as a building's signal reflectivity can mess an entire project up. More towers, more equipment, more redundancy, more personnel, more cables, more power, and forking all the money to do all this within the time limit or face fines is a huge task. And that's assuming it could even work on a technical level, sometimes you just can't do things (don't want to interfere with FAA requirements and such) and people don't understand.

I hate ATT too, but from a purely financial and planning point of view, I've been there. You can't just snap some fingers and make things happen just like that.

This sounds very much like what I read about how pilots on the front line rest. They would spend a lot of time in the air, and anytime there was downtime you took it. Some kind of research went into it and they came up with an entire process that would involve relaxing your body from head to toe, and then visualizing yourself somewhere else, like a boat in a lake or relaxing on a hillside. If you fail, you do the whole thing over. With enough training your mind becomes very adaptive and you can fall asleep faster and in highly disruptive environments. I believe it also had roots in meditation, where the more you do it the easier it gets.

Not sure what to do. I gave it my IMEI but it said that wasn't recognized as belonging to a Pixel 4a....except my phone clearly is, isn't running custom firmware, and still in my purchase history.

Similar, I take another system I'm familiar with and use it as an excuse. I know how to program a Cisco router, but heck if I know what an iPhone is, I can't use them at work. Virus? That's what the help-desk is for. Look, I work with fax machines, telephones, and video conference systems. The platform I work on is so secure that if we mess with it at all, it disables and we have to have them sent back and pay a lot of money to get them fixed, and I'd lose my job.

Granted, if it's something simple I'll help, but I'm not about to troubleshoot aunt May's login issues for Amazon from 300 miles away.

Pretty much, the only caveat I'd add is the assumption of 'right of way'. You can have situations where road conditions were unusual but drivers are not certain to all the conditions. The involved parties can all assume they have the 'right of way', when in reality the best option would have been for everyone to yield until conditions ARE certain.

I'll give a personal example: I once came upon an accident on a bridge, and the cop cars were already on the scene. It was night, raining hard and the cop cars were facing the oncoming lane with headlights set to high. I couldn't see anything past the cop cars, so I slowed down from 50 to 25. As I passed, I briefly saw a shadow of a person and heard them say "SLOW DOWN". I still have no idea how close I was to hitting them, but they must have been very close to hear them thru the rain and sirens. I should have gone much, much slower, maybe even stopped. Fortunately, nothing bad happened, but I had assumed that since the one lane was open that it was ok to use. I don't know why the cop cars oriented themselves in a way to blind oncoming drivers, but had something happened, the fault would have ultimately been mine regardless.

Another example is parking lots, so many accidents occur at busy locations. People forget how you are not supposed to block ingress (to prevent traffic backing up into the street and making things worse) and get road rage because they can't leave. I've seen people try to "squeeze in" and end up blocking an entire lot because they can't move. One side will say "zipper" (ie: "my turn for RoW") the other will say "right of way", and parking lots are notorious for not having any signs.

Edit: and ofc, old ladies who think blinkers give them RoW

Edit2: an example for cops: blowing thru red lights without making sure intersections are clear. To be fair, everyone should yield to a cop car in the performance of their duties, but this doesn't mean cop cars get a free pass for RoW and can plow thru full speed, damn the consequences. They still have to take safety of others in mind and yield if required.

Edit3: because I've had the discussion before. Yes, it's semantics. RoW and FTY are the same thing. I'm only saying the phrase is being sunsetted, no Judge wants to hear someone say RoW. Some laws even use them together as "Failure to Yield Right of Way". The goal is to prevent the mindset of entitlement, to make sure the clarity of safeguards remain in place.

A note, not all states operate this way, but the concept of 'right of way' is going away. Judges do not like the idea of someone feeling privileged enough to make a situation worse. In general, they want to implement fail-safes and not fail-unsafe situations.

Edit: To add - we've actually had this for a while, it's called 'failure to yield'. The switch is actually being more driven by emergency services making things worse, which is kind of relieving given the general sentiment. Unfortunately it's just another phrase for the same thing, semantics....but if you do go to court, you're better off presenting who failed vs who's entitled.

Might only be the whistleblowing stuff. Might not. Guess you'll have to kill me to find out.

Try using a tab suspend extension, something like 'auto tab discard'. Firefox has one built-in, but it's not aggressive enough.