Right. Those are recreational, not FDA approved medications. Congress gave the FDA authority to regulate medications. This upends that entire system, especially when the reasoning is without factual evidence.
archiotterpup
joined 2 years ago
Because if they refuse and then if the person downs the drink, gets too drunk and injures someone the bar and bartender are held responsible. Bar tenders are supposed to cut you off at a certain point to avoid this.
Yeah but he wouldn't have been as popular in the South
Non-action is a form of action. You still contribute either way. It's either with or without your consent.
This is a story, about a bunch of lawyers, who one day got a very dumb idea.
You mean the "Sick Old Man of Europe"?
Define censorship
This is such bs. Lawyers shouldn't be ruling on what is medically necessary. This will just feed into the ignorance and fear that transitioning is dangerous.
This is just the continuation of the GOP's assault on public education. Some children were meant to be left behind.
Hey, where do you think financialist Islam came from? Hint hint, it wasn't under Ottoman occupation. It was post British colonial rule under a system set up by the British.
British Law was exported to all of its colonies. Homosexuality was not taboo in Pre-Anglo Ottoman Iraq. After the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the British land grabs you start to see these kinds of changes in the penal code.
If their child is hiding their gender expression for fear of the parent's reaction then the risk is there no matter what. It will always be unexpected to them.