andrewta

joined 2 years ago
[–] andrewta 24 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Same products will go up everywhere else. These tariffs will screw everyone.

[–] andrewta 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In some states in the United States, if you get a divorce, they go back to birth so for example, a child home would be split up. But in most states, they only go back to the date of marriage. I will say : I’ll never get married ever. But if I was dumb enough to do it, I would absolutely never get married in a state that (during a divorce) went back to birth. And I would never live in that state (while married) either. What’s mine before the marriage is mine what is hers before the marriage is hers.

No one should be able to claim the ability to take something before the marriage ever existed. That’s just my opinion.

And yeah, I doubt it would ever get implemented.

[–] andrewta 3 points 1 month ago

Here's something nuts . I have three down votes and six up votes. Think about that. There is a solid percentage of people that think I'm wrong in saying what I said.

[–] andrewta 2 points 1 month ago

There are a number of states where the prenup is all but worthless.

[–] andrewta 0 points 1 month ago

Accused?

It's innocent until proven guilty.

Wait and see.

The only one I'm concerned about is the adult having sex with a minor (rape). If you have seen the appropriate documentation to show this happened. Then demand an answer on how this could play out under the rules of law. Do I think it's disgusting? Yes. But judges have to follow the law. Legislators write the law. Can a judge throw out a law? Yes. But they need a legal reason to do so. But at the end of the day... I'd want to see all the info before making a judgment on it. If the allegations are true.. I'd run like hell.

[–] andrewta 2 points 1 month ago

None. Sorry just my opinion.

Look at the unemployment numbers. Tell me it's a good idea to have less jobs.

[–] andrewta 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How?

If person a is shown to have been cheating then person a loses any claim to alimony.

Pretty simple.

Person A in divorce court “judge I want alimony”

Person B in divorce court “your honor Person A was cheating here’s the proof”

Judge “ no alimony will be awarded from Person B to Person A”

Why should anyone be allowed to get alimony after cheating? That’s just insult to injury.

Your spouse cheats you walk in on it and now you want a divorce. Added bonus you have to pay money to the cheater for life???

How does that make sense?

It should literally be law that the alimony goes away at that point.

[–] andrewta 13 points 1 month ago (17 children)

Just my opinion, if my spouse (I'm not married) walks up to me and asks if they can sleep with someone else and I say no. Then they do it anyway. I would absolutely call that cheating. Then I'd call a divorce attorney. If I had to pay alimony after the divorce I'd be extremely bitter.

[–] andrewta 47 points 1 month ago (51 children)

Great now make it so if you cheat you lose the ability to get alimony.

And an open relationship is different then cheating.

[–] andrewta 2 points 1 month ago

Same here this was perfectly played

[–] andrewta 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That would be awesome.

Get Bruce Willis to do it.

[–] andrewta 2 points 1 month ago

That would work

view more: ‹ prev next ›